jlknjl;ujmuy;;;;l l
|
Publishers Corner By Bill Gibbons Saturday, August 12, 2011: We are opposed to our current wars for two reasons: First these wars are illegal and unnecessary. Second: I have seen war up close having served in the navy during two wars and I can say, "THAT WAR IS HELL." I saw 65 of my shipmates blown to pieces at Okinawa, when our ship, the USS Rall, DE 304 was attacked by five Jap Kamikaze planes. We have discovers, as have millions of people, that this war was unnecessary, but was brought about by evil people, that simply wanted a war. Japan was goaded into starting the war. This was a war that the Japanese knew they could not win, but we left them no choice. We would like someone, that is smarter then we are to explain how we have profited from this illegal war. For the life of me I can't see any reason for these wars I do know what the wars have done for us. First: These wars have made us enemies of practically every living Arab Muslim and there are a billion of them, who would like to see us destroyed. Second: These wars have bankrupted the nation and have us on the brink of being destroyed as a nation. But, what have the wars done FOR US? Will someone please answer that question for me. Contact us at gibb@azci.net - Bill Gibbons
|
THE POPULISTS VIEWPOINT From http://www.aclean-sweep.com The Populists Viewpoint is a political education web site dedicated to spreading the belief in a Constitutional Republic and not a decadent democracy, where the unwashed rabble can vote themselves Hugh largess from the public treasury- Bill Gibbons Enter the web site HERE
January 23, 2012
We believe that states, county and local police should cease to help enforce all federal laws, because most of these laws are un-Constitutional and should not be enforced. We say don't enforce federal laws, because the feds don't want any help in enforcing federal immigration laws against illegal aliens. Either help with all laws or help with NO LAWS. Lattigo Smith
There are four articles today
I Wouldn’t Hire Ron Paul…But he says Paul is the right man to be president, read on
by Charles Goyette www.lewrockwell.com
Recently by Charles Goyette: Slip-Sliding Into Tyranny: The New American Way
I will grant that Ron Paul is both intelligent and wise. And yes, it is true, that he is the most effective champion of human liberty in public life and seems to know more about the U.S. Constitution than any other elected official. He does seem to be personally kind and is even patient with the most obnoxious media figures. And it’s clear from his voting record that he is a man of principle and integrity.
Still, I wouldn’t hire Ron Paul…
… to fix my car. He could be a backyard automotive tinkerer for all I know. But there is no public evidence to that effect. And I sure wouldn’t hire him to do eye surgery.
He’s not that kind of doctor.
Nor would I hire him to structure a leveraged buyout or manage a hostile corporate takeover. He’s not experienced in those things. In fact, for something like that, or to run a private equity firm that does corporate turnarounds, I actually might hire Mitt Romney. It seems he has both experience and demonstrable success in that area.
But I certainly wouldn’t hire Romney to be president.
Especially now.
With the global doomsday debt clock ticking down, the dollar’s world reserve currency status unwinding, and the American dream clearly beginning to fade, we desperately need someone knowledgeable about the economic principles and monetary policies that have gotten us into this mess.
Someone who knows how to get us out.
And that wouldn’t include Mitt Romney.
With all the demands of amassing his substantial personal fortune, Mitt has clearly been too busy to spend any time learning about the Federal Reserve and its role in our perpetual sequence of bubbles and busts, or studying Hayek to find out why state central economic planning must fail, or learning about money and credit from Mises.
It is unfortunate that people tend to confuse some of these financial and economic matters, imagining skills in one to be interchangeable with knowledge about the other. But they are not the same thing.
If Mitt Romney understood the key economic issues of our time, he wouldn’t have voted for TARP, Bush’s $700 billion bailout bill in 2008.
Did it do anything for the real estate market as promised?
No.
Did it do anything for employment or the debt crisis?
No.
After years, we still have depression era levels of unemployment and 45 million Americans on food stamps. And a national debt that has exploded from $9 trillion when the recession began to $15 trillion today.
Romney asserts the tired and the unverifiable: that if the Keynesians’ pump-more-money-into-the-
That’s a good self-exonerating line that the crowd plays over and over. But it is they themselves who did exactly what they have done for generations, blowing up one bubble after another.
Or, stated differently, they sold us the map that marched us into the swamp to begin with. And then they sold us another bogus $700 billion map that was supposed to lead us out.
Only it didn’t.
One could charitably say that Mitt understands none of this. Or cynically, that while TARP did nothing for homeowners in places like Kansas City, or for the unemployed in Modesto, it sure did something for Wall Street.
If Romney understood the Federal Reserve, he might not support its chairmen and its mission. But because Romney hasn’t devoted time to understanding central banking perhaps it needs to be described to him in a way that a corporate turnaround professional can understand.
What would Romney say about a hundred year old family-owned company whose outside management had destroyed 96 percent of the value of the company’s product?
Because that’s exactly what the Fed has done to the value of the dollar.
Would any self-respecting equity manager say, as Romney has said of the Fed, that such malfeasance doesn’t deserve his effort or focus? What if a closer look revealed just how much the company’s directors had prospered by their destruction of the family wealth? Would that be worth Romney’s attention?
It might be said that Mitt is altogether pleased that the nation’s monetary affairs are arranged to benefit investment bankers at the expense of the people. But if that is too cynical, it could be more charitably said that he just hasn’t had time to master the arcane world of central banking.
That’s fine.
But then Romney simply shouldn’t offer himself up as president.
Especially now.
Of course the very busy Mitt Romney seems to have given no more thought to American foreign policy than to the bailouts and the Fed. His glib call for a new American century of global military dominance has the anachronistic ring of someone who missed all the unintended consequences of our propping up sheiks and shahs and dictators around the world. And of someone who slept right through Bush’s elective war in Iraq. It sounds like someone who is completely clueless about the way the $1.2 trillion a year we spend on the national security state has bankrupted this country.
Romney says that if he knew then what we know now about Iraq, he wouldn’t have gone in.
That’s not good enough.
Because plenty of people knew then what we know now.
Ron Paul was clear that Iraq posed no threat to the security of this country. He knew that the war was being undertaken without constitutional authorization and that rather than an affair of days or weeks that we were told, he said that Bush’s splendid little war would be the biggest since World War II. He foresaw that the war would be accompanied by the growth of military and police powers along with the erosion of our civil liberties.
Having studied central banking and applied the insights of great economist like Mises, Ron Paul has described both in advance and in detail the cycle of bubbles and busts the Federal Reserve has plagued us with.
His 2003 description in Congress of the way the housing bubble would develop and the long-term damage it would do the U.S. economy was stunningly exact, a precise step-by-step preview of the calamity just as it unfolded.
The Federal Reserve may not merit Mitt Romney’s attention, but if the Fed had not been worthy of Ron Paul’s attention, we would not have learned the shocking truth about how the Fed had been acting as central bank to the world, secretly loaning trillions of dollars to the most politically powerful banks and companies. Not to mention foreign banks including Barclays, Royal Bank of Scotland, Deutsche Bank, UBS, Credit Suisse, and even one owned in substantial part by the Central Bank of Libya.
At this point it is not reasonable to expect that Mitt Romney has any idea what the economic consequences of these Federal Reserve policies will be. Since the mortgage meltdown the Federal Reserve has blown up its balance sheet, the adjusted monetary base, from $800 billion to more than $2.6 trillion. The cost of this policy is yet to be seen, but for one who understands money and credit like Ron Paul, that cost is entirely foreseeable. The consequences will be severe. It is America’s next big economic calamity.
Mitt Romney doesn’t know what the consequences of that will be. He hasn’t applied himself to understanding central banking and monetary theory. He hasn’t studied Mises and Hayek and Rothbard. He’s an equity raiser and corporate turnaround guy.
It’s a different skill set.
Mitt Romney might be a capable venture capitalist, but it would really be a serious mistake to hire him to be president. And that’s putting it charitably.
Ron Paul hasn’t spent his time structuring debt/equity ratios, thinking about mezzanine financing, or doing venture capital deals. But after a succession of shallow Romneys, following generations of failed Keynesian spend-our way-to-prosperity economics, and facing now the bankruptcy of the welfare/warfare state, for what ails this country Ron Paul is the doctor.
Let’s hire the right man this time.
January 19, 2012
Charles Goyette [send him mail] is the author of the New York Times bestseller The Dollar Meltdown: Surviving the Impending Currency Crisis with Gold, Oil, and Other Unconventional Investments, now available in paperback. And coming in February 2012, Charles Goyette's Freedom & Prosperity Letter. His new book Red and Blue and Broke All Over: Restoring America’s Free Economy will be released March 15.
Copyright © 2012 Charles Goyette
Charles Goyette [send him mail] is the author of the New York Times bestseller The Dollar Meltdown: Surviving the Impending Currency Crisis with Gold, Oil, and Other Unconventional Investments, now available in paperback. And coming in February 2012, Charles Goyette's Freedom & Prosperity Letter. His new book Red and Blue and Broke All Over: Restoring America’s Free Economy will be released March 15.
Paul Craig Roberts www.paulcraigroberts.org
Washington Moves The World Closer To War
January 16, 2012| Categories: Articles & Columns| Tags: Demitry Rogozin, EU, Iran, Israel:, nato, Russia, veto, War,
Since my January 11 column http://www.paulcraigroberts.
For someone as familiar with Washington as I am, I recognize these reports for what they are. They are Br’er Rabbit telling Br’er Fox “please don’t throw me in the briar patch.”
If you don’t know the Uncle Remus stories, you have missed a lot. Br’er Rabbit was born and raised in the briar patch.
What these “leaked” stories of Washington’s warnings and protests to Israel are all about is to avoid Washington’s responsibility for the war Washington has prepared. If the war gets out of hand, and if Russia and China intervene or nukes start flying, Washington wants the blame to rest on Israel, and Israel seems willing to accept the blame. Nikolai Patrushev, who heads Russia’s Security Council, has apparently been deceived by Washington’s manipulation of the media. According to the Interfax news agency, Patrushev condemned Israel for pushing the US towards war with Iran.
You get the picture. The helpless Americans. They are being bullied by Israel into acquiescing to a dangerous war. Otherwise, no more campaign contributions.
The facts are different. If Washington did not want war with Iran it would not have provided the necessary weapons to Israel. It would not have deployed thousands of US troops to Israel, with a view toward the American soldiers being killed in an Iranian response to Israel’s attack, thus “forcing” the US to enter the war. Washington would not have built a missile defense system for Israel and would not be conducting joint exercises with the Israeli military to make sure it works.
If Washington did not want Israel to start the war, Washington would inform the Israeli government in no uncertain words that an Israeli strike on Iran means that the US will NOT veto the UN’s denunciation of Israel and the sanctions that would be placed on Israel as a war criminal state. Washington would tell Israel that it is good-bye to the billions of dollars that the bilked American taxpayers, foreclosed from their homes by fraudulent mortgages and from jobs by offshoring, hand over by compulsion to Israel to support Israel’’s crimes against humanity.
But, of course, Washington won’t prevent the war that it so fervently desires.
Neither will Washington’s NATO puppets. “Great” Britain does as it is told, subservient and occupied Germany, bankrupt France, Italy occupied with US air bases with a government infiltrated by the CIA, bankrupt Spain and Greece will all, in hopes of an outpouring of US dollars and devoid of any dignity or honor, support the new war that could end life on earth.
Only Russia and China can prevent the war.
Russia took the first step when the newly appointed Deputy Prime Minister for military affairs, Demitry Rogozin told a press conference in Brussels that Russia would regard an attack on Iran as “a direct threat to our security.”
Washington is counting on subverting Russia’s opposition to Washington’s next war. Washington can time the attack on Iran right after the March elections in Russia. When Putin wins again, the treasonous Russian opposition parties, financed by the CIA, will unleash protests in the streets. The subservient and utterly corrupt Western media will denounce Putin for stealing the election. The orchestrated protests in Russia will turn violent and discredit, if not prevent, any Russian response to the naked aggression against Iran.
For Rogozin’s warning to be effective in preventing war, China needs to enter the fray. Washington is banking on China’s caution. China deliberates and never rushes into anything. China’s deliberation will serve Washington’s war.
It is possible that the crazed neocon Washington government will have one more “victory” before Russia and China comprehend that they are next on the extermination list. As this date cannot be far off, life on earth might expire before the unpayable debts of US and EU countries come due.
About Dr. Paul Craig Roberts
Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy and associate editor of the Wall Street Journal. He was columnist for Business Week, Scripps Howard News Service, and Creators Syndicate. He has had many university appointments. His internet columns have attracted a worldwide following.
Creating American Terrorists
Defenders of the recently passed National Defense Authorization Act, which declares the entire world to be a “battlefield” against terrorism and authorizes the U.S. military to detain indefinitely anyone suspected of being a terrorism supporter, have claimed that the White House will only use its new power carefully and with due process. Opponents note that the White House has never hesitated to use any new authority, no matter how outrageous, and that the trend of law enforcement and security agencies is to expand on powers granted, not to rein them in or limit them. The track record of the Obama administration on civil liberties is particularly bad, as it has broadened its definition of war powers, reneged on its promise to close Guantanamo Prison, and supported numerous dubious terrorism prosecutions. It has also become adept at silencing critics through the repeated exploitation of the state-secrets privilege, which effectively dismisses any case accusing the government of abuse or malfeasance.
So let us accept that the government now has the power to send a team of military police to anyone’s home in any state in the Union and can demand that that person surrender without any recourse to a lawyer or judicial due process. The military can then detain the individual incommunicado for any length of time and can presumably send him to Guantanamo for special confinement, claiming that the reason for the detention is support of terrorism, which can be almost anything, including a letter to the editor of the local paper complaining about the goonery of the Transportation Security Administration. Once in detention, the suspect only has such options as are granted to him by the military. He cannot see a lawyer, cannot invoke habeas corpus or other constitutional privileges, cannot confront any witnesses against him, and cannot challenge any information prejudicial to him even if it is hearsay or fabricated. In other words, the accused can be arrested for no reason and held indefinitely without any protections that enable him to push back against being detained. Most people would consider a criminal justice system that permits such detention ipso facto a police state.
Now let us accept for a moment that the White House and Justice Department are well-intentioned and will not use their newfound authority to detain anyone in a questionable fashion. The expanded powers will only be used to detain foreign terrorists who are caught in flagrante, more or less. That would be fine, perhaps, but for one small problem. Because the definition of a terrorism supporter has become enormously elastic, it can be stretched to include anything. If the whole world has become a battlefield, speaking out or acting against powerful vested interests can be dangerous because those interests can turn around and exploit the system to label one a terrorist. And once you are labeled a terrorist, your constitutional rights vanish and you might as well sit around and wait for that knock on the door — or, rather, for the door to be kicked in.
That is what House Resolution 3131 is all about. It is titled, in part, “To direct the secretary of state to submit a report on whether any support organization that participated in the planning or execution of the recent Gaza flotilla attempt should be designated as a foreign terrorist organization….”The bill then goes on to assert that the two flotillas in 2010 and 2011 opposing Israel’s blockade of Gaza were terrorist actions. But the only problem is that it relies on information from the Israeli Intelligence and Information Center to do so, meaning that Congress is deferring to a foreign government organization to make a judgment that directly impacts that selfsame government. And the Israelis are not shy about calling someone a terrorist, if it suits the narrative they are trying to present. They describe a Turkish organization involved in the first flotilla in 2010, known by its acronym IHH, as linked to al-Qaeda and Hamas based on evidence that no one else in the world accepts, apart from Congress, that is. The Turkish vessel Mavi Marmara was clearly aiming to take on the Israeli navy, armed to the teeth with “100 metal rods, 200 knives, 50 wooden clubs, and a telescopic sight for a gun.”In reality, the rods were torn from the ships rails when the heavily armed Israeli commandos boarded at night from helicopters. The knives were pocket knives and utility knives from the vessel’s galley, and the clubs were broken from deck chairs to repel the attackers. I will not speculate on the telescopic sight, but there was not a real weapon anywhere on board. The Israelis killed nine Turks, shooting several in the head at close range, including an American citizen. Congress has yet to express its outrage at the Israeli action — quite the contrary —and Hillary Clinton’s State Department has been silent, apart from warning the subsequent 2011 flotilla that the American embassy would do nothing to protect U.S. citizens aboard.
Regarding the second flotilla of July 2011, HR 3131 goes on to state that “Greek authorities boarded ships and took into custody several individuals, including Captain John Klusmire of the ship Audacity of Hope as it violated Greek Coast Guard orders by setting sail without permission.” Klusmire is a U.S. citizen who was not breaking any American law, it should be noted. He was later released by the Greek authorities.
The bill concludes with its “Sense of Congress,” surely an oxymoron if there ever was one: “the secretary of state shall submit … a report on whether any support organization that participated in the planning or execution of the recent Gaza flotilla attempt should be designated as a foreign terrorist organization … [to] include information on … the sources of any logistical, technical, or financial support for the Gaza flotilla ships, including the Audacity of Hope, that were to set sail from Greece on July 1, 2011.”
I personally know a number of organizations that provided material or financial support to one or both of the Gaza flotillas. I also personally know that none of those organizations support violence against the state of Israel and that the people behind them believed then and now that they were exercising their constitutional rights in speaking out and acting nonviolently against what they and most of the world regard as an illegal and immoral blockade of Gaza. But, if the bill passes in Congress, a bureaucrat in the U.S. Department of State will now be able to call those people and their associated groups “terrorists,” and Hillary Clinton will be able to confirm that judgment to Congress. Next step is the MPs at the door.
If people cannot see what a slippery slope all of this is, they not thinking very clearly. HR 3131 is admittedly still sitting in congressional committee, but it has some very powerful sponsors, including Ileana Ros-Lehtinen of Florida, who heads the Foreign Affairs Committee and is a rabid supporter of Israel. The bill not only indicts whole groups of people exercising their constitutional rights and labels them “terrorists,” it even names one American who was, at the time, breaking no U.S. law. Klusmire’s only crime was to “set sail without permission” — in Greece. It was clearly a bogus charge manufactured to suit by a vulnerable Greek government desperately needing international loans and under pressure from the United States and Israel.
Klusmire’s real crime was to oppose a powerful interest group, the Israel Lobby. To do so these days is to invite a charge of terrorism support with the option of being arrested by the Pentagon and locked up somewhere at the pleasure of the president of the United States. How low have we sunk, Mr. Obama? You portray yourself as a man of honor and a defender of constitutionalism, but you have opened the gates to lawlessness and authoritarian rule. And even if you are as benign as you depict yourself, you have provided the legal tools for those who might follow you — the Gingriches, the Perrys, the Bachmanns, and the Santorums — to possibly do much, much worse.
CALIFORNIA: AMERICA'S FIRST FAILED STATE
By Frosty Wooldridge www.newswithviews.com
January 19, 2012 NewsWithViews.com
In 1965, California housed a reasonable 15 million people. No traffic jams, little air pollution and everyone spoke English. Route 66, from Chicago to Los Angeles, ended at the Santa Monica Pier. Americans drove to Yosemite National Park for a delightful weekend of hiking. Tony Bennett sang, “I left my heart in San Francisco.”
California ranked among the top five educational systems in America. Hollywood produced incredible movies with Gregory Peck, Susan Hayward, John Wayne, Cary Grant, Marilyn Monroe, Robert Redford, Paul Newman and Jane Russell. I loved Gary Cooper. Bing Crosby sang away our troubles and Bob Hope laughed away our cares.
Few criminals plied the streets of cities in California. Everyone pledged their allegiance to the United States of America and our stars and stripes. Skiers and surfers plied the waves and moguls.
But in 1965, something happened in the Halls of Congress called the “Immigration Reform Act” pushed by the late Teddy Kennedy that changed the 200,000 annual incoming immigrants from compatible countries to 1.2 million third world immigrants annually. Senator Howard Metzenbaum said, “He let the flood gates wide open.”
Within 40 years, the United States galloped from193 million people to 315 million in 2012. Kennedy’s bill will add another 138 million people by 2050-a scant 38 years from now. From a net exporter of oil, we now import 7 out of 10 barrels at a cost of trillions of dollars. Kennedy’s egregious mistake changed the ethnic, linguistic and cultural foundation of America into what we see in California today. Also, Houston, Chicago, Miami, Detroit and New York.
His single act changed the entire history of America from success to utter and growing chaos on multiple levels.
California reached a mind-blowing 38 million people in 2011. It adds 1,655 people net gain daily. It adds over 400 vehicles 24/7 on its already crushed highways. (Source: www.CapsWeb.org) California expects to add 20 million people within 30 years.
What is driving that kind of growth? Over 10-12 million legal immigrants in California were born abroad. Immigrants birth 900,000 babies annually. (www.cis.org, Dr. Steven Camarata) Something in the range of 4 to 5 million illegal immigrants live and work in California. Most do not pay taxes and others pay on forged identification.
For every added person, 25.4 acres of land must be destroyed to build homes, schools, roads, malls and everything else to support that person. Known as “ecological footprint”, it destroys wilderness and arable land. Thus, California leads the country in animal and plant extinction rates.
Worse, California with its seething, hungry human mob sucks up so much water from the Colorado River that it fails to reach the ocean. As it adds another 20 million people, it will destroy millions upon millions of acres of farm land.
On the educational front, over 100 languages now paralyze California school systems. From the top five states in education, California sank to the bottom five in the United States. English has become a foreign language in California.
As to crime, MS-13 gangs work with the 20,000 member “18th Street Gang” to power drugs, guns and other contraband into the streets of America. Pot farms grow in national parks.
As to cultural breakdown, California now features major Mexican cock fighting organizations throughout the state. Police caught one group of 300 Mexicans last week as they roared and screamed at their blood sport:
In Freemont, California, the call to worship for its dominant Muslim immigrant audience heralds from the growing network of Mosques. Women’s rights degrade, female genital mutilation grows, arranged marriages are commonplace and honor killings take place. (Covered up by the liberal press, of course.)
Yosemite features wall to wall crowds that make any chance for a wilderness experience a hike into human dominated wilderness frenzy.
Most of the children born in California today feature Mexican parents living on American welfare. The EBT program or Electronic Benefits Transfers rewards single mothers unlimited financial support for every baby they produce. And they produce them by the tens of thousands. One mother said on a recording, “I get everything for free…I don’t know why anyone would want to work in America.” Write me at frostyw@juno.com and I will send you the live video of the interview.
Thus, California runs a $24 billion debt that cannot be paid. Ultimately, California will bankrupt into chaos. It suffers from a Faustian Bargain that degrades into Hobson’s Choice.
With so many languages, so many ethnic tribes and so many cultures fighting for dominance in California, how will it survive the next 20 million added people? The TV journalist Bill Moyers asked the famed science fiction writer Isaac Asimov, “Which is the greater danger - nuclear warfare or the population explosion?
“The latter absolutely!” said Asimov. “To bring about nuclear war, someone has to DO something; someone has to press a button. To bring about destruction by overcrowding, mass starvation, anarchy, the destruction of our most cherished values—there is no need to do anything. We need only do nothing except what comes naturally—and breed. And how easy it is to do nothing."
Asimov followed up with a penetrating reality check brought about by overpopulation: “...democracy cannot survive overpopulation. Human dignity cannot survive it. Convenience and decency cannot survive it. As you put more and more people into the world, the value of life not only declines, it disappears. It doesn't matter if someone dies. The more people there are, the less one individual matters.”
California will become our first third world country within our country. It pretty well has reached that status in 2012. It’s a failing state like Mexico. Corruption is a mechanism by which a third world country operates. Illiteracy drives a failed state. California defines that reality.
I suspect that Houston, Chicago, Detroit and other heavily dominated immigrant cities will follow California. How come I see this “thing” accelerating and most Americans apathetically sit by and do nothing? Our kids will curse our inaction and historians will laugh at the stupidity of mass immigration, diversity and multiculturalism as it took the greatest country in the world down to its knees. Tragically, we did nothing to stop it.
To show you where we’re headed in-depth, read Pat Buchanan’s epic work: Suicide of a Superpower.
Listen to Frosty Wooldridge on Wednesdays as he interviews top national leaders on his radio show "Connecting the Dots" at www.themicroeffect.com at 6:00 PM Mountain Time. Adjust tuning in to your time zone.
© 2012 Frosty Wooldridge - All Rights Reserved
CBS Poll: Ron Paul Can Defeat Obama
by James Buchanan
A recent CBS poll shows that Ron Paul has as good a chance of beating Obama as Mitt Romney. For the last six months, we’ve been beaten over the head with the dubious claim that Romney stood the best chance. In fact, most people when asked why they were supporting Romney could not think of a single issue that he supported. Instead all they could say was that he could beat Obama.
Romney however is a Republican liberal, and every attempt to run a Republican liberal against a Democrat liberal HAS FAILED. The liberal voters prefer a real Democrat liberal over a Republican, and the conservative voters either stay home or vote for a Third Party candidate. The dismal performance of RINO John McCain versus Obama immediately comes to mind. And then there was the compromising weakling moderate Bob Dole, who couldn’t dislodge Bill Clinton from the presidency.
The CBS article notes “Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney and Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas, run neck-and-neck with President Obama in a general-election matchup, according to a new CBS News poll released late on Monday that shows the two front-runners in Tuesday’s New Hampshire GOP primary running stronger against the president than their fellow Republicans.”
“Romney posts a two-point lead over Obama, 47 percent to 45 percent, within the poll’s margin of error of plus or minus 2.8 percentage points. He leads Obama, 45 percent to 39 percent, among independent voters.”
“Obama’s lead over Paul is just one point, 46 percent to 45 percent, as Paul leads among independents by 7 points.”
“The president posts more significant leads over the other GOP candidates, but against each he is below the critical 50-percent threshold: He leads former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, 49 percent to 41 percent; former Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman, 48 percent to 41 percent; Texas Gov. Rick Perry, 49 percent to 42 percent; and former Sen. Rick Santorum, R-Pa., 47 percent to 43 percent.”
Note that Romney has been hailed as the “front-runner” for months even though 75 percent of Republicans keep voting against him. Meanwhile Ron Paul has been ridiculed by the mainstream media and dismissed by various pundits. If these two men had received equal treatment from the mainstream media, Ron Paul would be way ahead of Romney in the polls.
People need to vote for a candidate who will defend the Constitution, not another empty suit like Romney or Obama. Americans need to elect Ron Paul if they want to preserve their Rights and freedom.
War is Peace, Freedom is Slavery … and Fighting Back is ‘Aggression’
by Kevin Carson, January 14, 2012
The US Department of Defense recently promulgated a new "defense" guidance document: "Sustaining US Global Leadership: Priorities for 21st Century Defense." I use scare quotes because it just doesn’t seem quite right to use "defense" to describe a document that — like its predecessors — envisions something like an American Thousand-Year Reich.
The greatest shift in emphasis is in the section "Project power despite Anti-Access/Area Denial Challenges." The "threat" to be countered is that China and Iran "will continue to pursue asymmetric means to counter our power projection capabilities."
That refers to a long-standing phenomenon: What Pentagon analysts call "Assassin’s Mace" weapons – cheap, agile weapons that render expensive, high-tech, weapons systems ineffective at a cost several orders of magnitude cheaper than the Pentagon’s gold-plated turds. In the context of "area denial," they include cheap anti-ship mines, surface-to-air missiles, and anti-ship missiles like the Sunburn (which some believe could destroy or severely damage aircraft carriers).
Thus the Pentagon defines as a "threat" a country’s ability to defend itself effectively against attack or to prevent an enemy from putting offensive forces into place to attack it. Yes, you read that right: to the American national security establishment, it’s considered threatening when you prepare to defend yourself against attack by the United States. It’s the perspective of a Family Circus character: "Mommy, he hit me back!" That kind of double standard is pretty common in the National Security State’s assessment of the world.
What can one say of a situation in which America runs a military budget equal to the rest of the industrialized world put together, maintains military bases in half the countries around the globe, routinely intervenes to overthrow governments, rings China with military bases — then solemnly announces that China’s military establishment is "far larger than called for by its legitimate defensive needs?"
Considering that the US considers its "legitimate defensive needs" to encompass outspending the other top ten military powers in the world combined and maintaining the ability to preemptively attack any other country in the world, it’s hard to guess what the Pentagon’s criterion is for determining China’s "legitimate defensive needs." But it’s safe to say "legitimate" defensive forces don’t extend to the ability for China to defend its territory against attack from the main actual threat facing it: A global superpower trying to turn China’s neighborhood into a battlefield.
And how about attacking Saddam for "making war on his own neighbors" – when the US actively supported his invasion of Iran in the 1980s? Not to mention the US Marines waltzing in and out of most of America’s Caribbean "neighbors" throughout the middle of the 20th century. Did they have "incubator babies" in Nicaragua and Costa Rica back in the 1930s?
To Washington, any country capable of resisting American attack, or of "defying" American commands (whether under a UN Security Council figleaf or not) is by definition a "threat." And any country inflicting significant losses on US military forces, in the process of defending itself against American military attack, is guilty of aggression (against US attempts to "defend our freedom," one presumes).
American perceptions of "self-defense" and "aggression" are as distorted as those of Nazi Germany. When the only way you can "defend yourself" against another country’s "threat" is to go to the other side of the world to fight it, because it lacks the logistical capability to project military force more than a few hundred miles outside its own borders — and the main "threat" is its ability to fight back when you attack it — you know something’s pretty messed up.
Originally published at the Center for a Stateless Society | Licensed for reproduction under Creative Commons Attribution 3.0
Victor Thorn examines the Jewish connections behind Barack Obama’s rise to power posted under:
Who Is Behind Barack Obama’s Rise to Stardom?
‘The Rothschild-Soros connection controls voter registration (ACORN), money laundering (Tides), billions in stimulus spending (Apollo), possibly the future of health care (SEIU), finance (Franks), and the Oval Office’s inner workings (Emanuel, Axelrod and Summers)’
Is Barack Obama the product of a vast socialist conspiracy designed to undermine the fundamental tenets established by our Founding Fathers, all bankrolled and organized by Jewish financiers? The answer is unequivocally yes.
To deconstruct this labyrinth-like network, one must start at the top with Jewish businessman George Soros and his ties to the world’s most powerful Jewish banking family. Journalist, historian and economic researcher William Engdahl sets the stage.
“Soros has been identified as a front man for the Rothschild banking group. Understandably, neither he nor the Rothschilds wants this important fact to be public.” He continues, “Soros’s connection to the ultra-secret international finance circles of the Rothschilds is not just an ordinary or accidental banking connection.”
Finally, in a November 1, 1996 article, Engdahl writes, “From the very first days when Soros created his own investment fund in 1969, he owed his success to his relation to the Rothschild family banking network.”
Soros, through his Open Society Institute, funnels approximately $300 million a year into various liberal venues, including the influential MoveOn.org, which he owns. According to veteran researcher Anton Chaitkin, Soros also hand-picked Barack Obama to challenge Hillary Clinton (and ultimately defeat GOP nominee John McCain). On Sept. 5, 2008, he wrote, “Barack Obama came under special Soros sponsorship in the 2004 U.S. Senate race [and] raised $60,000 for his campaign.” After attaining victory, Obama met personally with Soros, then attended a fundraiser at his home.
Chaitkin elaborates further in “Soros Runs British Foreign Office Coup Against U.S. Elections,” an online article. “On December 4, 2006, two years after getting into the U.S. Senate, Barack Obama went to Soros’s New York office to be interviewed for higher office. Soros then took Obama into a conference room for other politically subordinate billionaires. With money and connections assured, Obama announced for the presidency soon afterward.”
Lets look at the words of Michelle Obama from a June 19, 2008 speech. She said, “We’re going to have to change our traditions and our history.” She explained further on Aug. 25, 2008. “All of us are driven by a simple belief that the world as it is just won’t do. We have an obligation to fight for the world as it should be.”
Who, precisely, will determine how our world should be? Mrs. Obama’s poignant phrase was lifted directly from Saul Alinsky, a Chicago-based Jewish extremist who penned the handbook for far-left causes, Rules for Radicals.
To implement his plans to undermine America, an intricate network needed to be established that would spread its tentacles throughout every aspect of society. One of the primary vehicles they utilized was the Tides Foundation, to which Soros contributed $13 million from 1997-2003. Established by Jewish antiwar activist Drummond Pike in 1976, this tax-exempt organization serves a very important function. According to researcher Ben Johnson of Front Page Magazine in September 2004, they “allow high-profile individuals to fund extremist organizations by ‘laundering’ their money through Tides, leaving no paper trail.”
In essence, after taking a 10 percent cut, Tides has fed over $300 million to entities such as cop killer Mumia Abu-Jamal, MoveOn.org and those who advocate abortion-on-demand, all the while assuring contributors that they won’t be publicly linked to these causes. One look at the Tide Foundation’s board reveals who calls the shots.
Drummond, senior vice president Gary Schwartz, and executive vice president Ellen Friedman are all Jewish. Pike also used his leverage to bail out ACORN’s welfare rights leader Wade Rathke, after he embezzled $948,507. To protect Rathke, ACORN never contacted law enforcement officials or sought prosecution. Instead, Stephanie Strom of The New York Times wrote on Aug. 17, 2008, “The organization announced that an anonymous supporter had agreed” to pay off the debt. That man was Drummond Pike. To cover their tracks, Arthur Schwartz (also Jewish) now coordinates their slippery public relations.
Of course, Barack Obama began his political career as the chief national trainer for ACORN, which now faces lawsuits in 14 states for voter fraud. Obama’s mentor as a community organizer in Chicago was Gerald Kellman, a Saul Alinksy proteg�. To begin his meteoric rise toward the White House, money originated from what Clarice Feldman of American Thinker calls the “Gang of Four”— Soros, Peter Lewis, Stephen Bing and Herbert & Marion Sandler. All are Jewish billionaires.
One of Obama’s most important backers was Marilyn Katz (Jewish), who oversaw security for the SDS (Students for a Democratic Society) and advocated violent guerrilla tactics toward the police (as did Obama associate William Ayers of the Weather Underground). Katz became a fundraising bundler for Obama, as well as hosting fundraisers and serving as an Illinois delegate at the 2008 Democratic National Convention.
The Tides Foundation controls the San Francisco-based Apollo Alliance, which “absolutely believes that government is the solution to all social and economic problems.”
On July 28, Phil Kerpen of Americans for Prosperity described how the “Apollo Alliance is designed to bring together the elements of organized labor with community organizers and green groups.” More importantly, Kerpen revealed that the Apollo Alliance “put out a draft stimulus bill in 2008 . . . that included almost everything that ended up being in the final stimulus bill.”
Van Jones, Obama’s new “green jobs czar,” described the Apollo Alliance as a “grand unified field theory for progressive left causes.” Who exactly is Van Jones? After participating in the 1992 L.A. riots (for which he was arrested and incarcerated), Jones told the East Bay Express on November 2, 2005, “I met all these young radical people of color—I mean, really radical Communists and anarchists. And it was like: this is what I need to be part of. I spent the next 10 years of my life working with a lot of these people I met in jail, trying to be a revolutionary. I was a rowdy black revolutionary on April 28th, and when the verdicts came down on April 29th, I was a Communist.”
To round out this list, the SEIU (Service Employees International Union) is primarily responsible for what is contained in Obama’s socialized health care bill. Andy Stern and Anna Burger lead the SEIU, both of whom are Jewish cronies of George Soros. Their vice president is Gerald Hudson (Jewish). Pushing this bill and the stimulus package to various media outlets is Robert Borosage (Jewish) of the Institute for America’s Future (also a huge recipient of Soros’s funding). Overseeing the housing and banking industries is none other than Barney Frank (Jewish), chairman of the House Financial Services Committee. Last but not least, Key members of Obama’s inner circle—David Axelrod, Lawrence Summers and Rahm Emanuel are Jewish and Bilderberg.
Putting this complicated matter into perspective is educational theorist and critic David Solway. On July 7, 2009 he wrote, “We Jews are a sly and surreptitious people . It pains me to admit this, but candor compels. . . . [T]he best way to bring America to its knees, to weaken its will to survive, to cleverly turn it against itself, was to do everything in our considerable arsenal of means to deliver the White House to Barack Obama.”
The conspiracy has been completed, and now the Jewish Rothschild-Soros connection controls voter registration (ACORN), money laundering (Tides), billions in stimulus spending (Apollo), possibly the future of health care (SEIU), finance (Franks), and the Oval Office’s inner workings (Emanuel, Axelrod and Summers).
Victor Thorn is a hard-hitting researcher, journalist and the author of many books on 9-11 and the New World Order. These include 9-11 Evil: The Israeli Role in 9-11 and Phantom Flight 93.
Subscribe to American Free Press. Online subscriptions: One year of weekly editions—$15 plus you get a BONUS ELECTRONIC BOOK – HIGH PRIESTS OF WAR – By Michael Piper.
Print subscriptions: 52 issues crammed into 47 weeks of the year plus six free issues of Whole Body Health: $59 Order on this website or call toll free 1-888-699-NEWS .
Not Copyrighted. Readers can reprint and are free to redistribute – as long as full credit is given to American Free Press – 645 Pennsylvania Avenue SE, Suite 100 Washington, D.C. 20003
Staff
Under a False Flag
Our “friends,” the Israelis, implicate us in war crimes
by Justin Raimondo, January 16, 2012 www.antiwar.com
Will Israel succeed in dragging us into war with Iran?
If not, it won’t be for lack of trying. Their influential lobby in the US has been agitating for a US strike since the last year of the Bush presidency, when they almost succeeded in pulling it off: fortunately for us, Bush demurred, perhaps because he didn’t want his legacy to be two unwinnable and disastrous wars instead of just one.
Israel was to be the spearhead, with the US providing back up support, as the Guardian reported at the time:
“Israel gave serious thought this spring to launching a military strike on Iran’s nuclear sites but was told by President George W Bush that he would not support it and did not expect to revise that view for the rest of his presidency, senior European diplomatic sources have told the Guardian.”
Deterred from firing the first shots of World War III, the Israelis didn’t give up. Instead, they turned to other less direct means to achieve their goal. As Mark Perry reports on foreignpolicy.com:
“Buried deep in the archives of America’s intelligence services are a series of memos, written during the last years of President George W. Bush’s administration, that describe how Israeli Mossad officers recruited operatives belonging to the terrorist group Jundallah by passing themselves off as American agents. According to two U.S. intelligence officials, the Israelis, flush with American dollars and toting U.S. passports, posed as CIA officers in recruiting Jundallah operatives – what is commonly referred to as a‘false flag’ operation.”
You bet those memos are buried deep – lest Americans discover that their faithful “allies”are trying to implicate them in war crimes.
Jundallah is a terrorist organization, Sunni-oriented and linked to al-Qaeda, that has murdered Iranian civilians in bombings and other attacks within Iran: their ostensible goal is to “liberate”Iranian (and Pakistani) Baluchistan. According to the memos, the Israelis recruited these terrorists right out in the open in London, where Mossad operatives – posing as CIA officers – met with Jundallah officials.“It’s amazing what the Israelis thought they could get away with,”Perry quotes one intelligence officer as saying. “They apparently didn’t give a damn what we thought.”
Of course not – and why should they? After all, we’ve given them a pass every time: when Jonathan Pollard stole what US officials described as the intelligence community’s “crown jewels” and passed them off to the Russians; when they stole our trade and military secrets and passed them off to China: when they were tracking the 9/11 conspirators and didn’t tell us what Mohammed Atta and his crew were up to. They took our “foreign aid” with one hand, and stabbed us in the back with the other.
What did we do about it, and what were the consequences for the Israelis?
The answer is: nothing, and none: nor has the story changed much this time around. Perry reports:
“Asenior administration official vowed to‘take the gloves off’ with Israel… but the United States did nothing – a result that the officer attributed to‘political and bureaucratic inertia.’”
“’In the end,’ the officer noted, ‘it was just easier to do nothing than to, you know, rock the boat.’ Even so, at least for a short time, this same officer noted, the Mossad operation sparked a divisive debate among Bush’s national security team, pitting those who wondered‘just whose side these guys [in Israel] are on’ against those who argued that ‘the enemy of my enemy is my friend.’”
Oh well, I suppose you could call the cancellation of those planned joint US-Israeli military exercises more than nothing. Although Washington is claiming the cancellation is due to a desire to dial down tensions in the region, that didn’t stop them from ordering their warships to the Persian Gulf. In any case, the cancellation of “Austere Challenge 12” will hardly stop the Israelis from pursuing their plan to provoke the Iranians into attacking US facilities and/or personnel in the region. After all, since there are never any significant consequences attendant on their bad behavior, what have they got to lose?
The Americans don’t dare come out in public and take Tel Aviv to task: the powerful Israel lobby would have the President’s scalp, and Congress – aptly characterized as “Israeli-occupied territory” by the politically incorrect Pat Buchanan – would probably pass a resolution condemning their own President if Obama dared step out of line. And then there is all that campaign money the Democrats hope to scarf up this worrisome election season: taking the Israelis out to the wood shed would enrage the big money-bags who make unconditional support for Israel the price of their support.
Why should the Israelis care that their actions put US personnel in jeopardy, inviting attacks in kind from Tehran? Iranian attacks on US military personnel stationed in Iraq could easily inflict thousands of casualties, and this is especially true now that the US footprint is considerably reduced – but that would be the Americans’ problem. The Israelis, for their part, had the perfect “false flag” operation going: neither the Iranians nor top Jundallah cadre knew where the support was really coming from.
Jundallah’s leader, Abdolmalek Rigi,was captured by the Iranians and executed in the summer of 2010: before he was offed, however, he did an interview with Iranian media in the course of which he recalled a 2007 meeting in Morocco with a group of individuals who were supposed to be “NATO officials: “When we thought about it,” said Rigi, “we came to the conclusion that they are either Americans acting under NATO cover or Israelis.”
Rigi was just another pawn in the game as far as Israelis are concerned: they aren’t too particular about the types of unwitting allies they recruit. Rigi personally murdered his brother-in-law for disobeying orders, cutting his head off while Dan Rather’s cameras rolled. Kidnappings are a Jundallah favorite, along with videotaped decapitations. The Israelis have a whole collection of such charming types: they are arming and training the separatists of the Kurdish Workers Party (PKK), who conduct terrorist attacks on civilian targets in Turkey, and are doing the same for the Mujahedin-e-Khalq (MEK), a weird Marxist cult formerly succored by Saddam Hussein, which has carried out terrorist attacks in Iran.
These are the allies and proxies of “the only democracy in the Middle East”!
The tactical objective behind Israeli support for Jundallah is simple: magnifying tensions between the US and Iran takes us farther down the road to war. When Rigi was captured and “confessed” on Iranian television, he averred that he was a tool of the CIA and claimed he had recently been on a US military base in Afghanistan: no doubt the Israelis were well pleased with their“student.” He had learned his lessons well.
Israeli sponsorship of Jundallah, the PKK, and MEK all point to Tel Aviv’s underlying strategic perspective, and that is a policy of sowing chaos whenever and wherever possible. If the idea is to atomize Israel’s neighbors, and reduce them to a condition of internal chaos, then this is surely the best way to go about it: by sponsoring every separatist and violently crazed sect that will take their cash.
“Flush with American dollars and toting U.S. passports,” as Perry put it, the Israelis arrived in London on the lookout for recruits. We know where those American dollars came from – straight out of the pockets of American taxpayers, who are forced to shell out over $3 billion every year in “foreign aid” to Israel. But what about those American passports? Maybe they came from the same place these passports originated. In the brouhaha over the Mossad’s theft of passports in New Zealand, Great Britain, Ireland, France, and elsewhere, no mention was ever made of any “cloned” American passports – but that doesn’t mean it didn’t happen.
The Israelis cannot take out Iran all on their own: they need the US to deliver the death blow and execute a program of“regime change” on the ground. Then and only then will their goal of regional hegemony be realized. That’s why they’ve mobilized all their resources, including their numerous and vocal political allies in the United States, to pull out all the stops and provoke a shooting war between the US and Iran. That such an event would lead to an economic downturn that would make the present one seem relatively prosperous is irrelevant, from the narrow perspective of a rabid Israeli nationalist. And that is precisely who is making policy in Israel today: the most extreme right-wing ultra-nationalist government since the founding of the Jewish state.
To these extremists, the Americans are an obstacle rather than a valued ally. And they have increasing power in Israel, in the government and in society at large. Fundamentalists are pushing the separation of the sexes, and the powerful religious parties are campaigning for expanded “settlements,” i.e. more provocations aimed at the downtrodden Palestinians.
Isn’t it time we gave our“special relationship” with Israel a second look? As Israeli agents covertly seek to incite the peoples of the Middle East – including the Iranians – against us, one has to wonder, like those intelligence analysts cited above: just whose side are these guys on, anyway?
The answer is: they’re on their own side. The question Perry’s scoop ought to raise in the mind of every American is: when are we going to start being on our own side?
HERE ARE FOUR ARTICLES FOR YOU TO READ AND WE URGE YOU TO READ ALL FOUR WHAT KIND OF PRESDIENT WOULD RON PAUL BE?By Lattigo SmithI cannot answer that question, nor can anyone else. We watch what politicians do and we base our opinion on what they do and not what they say. Politicians say what their handlers think will appeal to the public.Most, we can't say all, because there may be a few politicians that this does not apply to, but we have met very few that this statement is not true about, have two goals in life: The first is to get elected to some political office and two: The second goal is to stay in office for the rest of their life and EVERYTHING they say or do is done to keep them in office.They don't care about their country or their family. Harsh words you say. Yes and we fully believe what we say. We can say this, because their descendants will have to live under the system that they have created and the rulers of the future will not care what happens to the descendants of those that created the system, therefore their descendants will suffer along with everyone else and this does not seem to bother them. This makes such people a threat to society and they should all be run out of office.We know what Romney, Gingrich, Huntsman, Santorum and Perry would do once they get to the White House, because we know what they did while they were in office. They were all internationalist in what they did. They trashed the Constitution and supported the growth of big oppressive government. We could say that they are nothing more than a Bush-Obama clone and it will be business as usual once they are elected. They will be nothing but puppets; the same as Bush and Obama are. They will be controlled by the same people that control Obama. The Controllers stay the same, no matter who occupies the White House or congress.Ron Paul could be a different story. We don't know what kind of president Paul would make, but we do know what kind of congressman he has been and we believe that he will be the same kind of president.We are for Paul for the simple reason that the media, including the so-called right-wing commentators and most politicians of both political parties are against him. The men with money to spend are against him, because they are afraid that he could be a problem if he was elected president. These people are doing all they can to persuade the public to reject Ron Paul and that alone should be enough for anyone to seek to see Paul elected. If Paul would be bad for these people, he could be very good for the rest of us.President John F. Kennedy was the only president in my lifetime of 85 years that really tried to do something good for the country and they murdered him. These people don't want anyone in the White House that wants to see the people treated fairly. These people are not for the American people, but only for themselves. THINK ABOUT THAT.Romney Tied to Terrorism
January 13, 2012 dave
Links to radical group operating inside Iran a cause for concern
By Ralph Forbes in American Free Press www.americanfreepress.net
GOP presidential hopeful Mitt Romney looked like a deer caught in the headlights when he was asked if he supported an international, anti-American terrorist organization with a bloody record for killing innocent civilians thousands of times worse than al Qaeda. This “expert on international affairs” claimed he never had heard of them. Then, like a lying politician, he promised: “I’ll take a look at the issue.” Video taken at a town hall meeting in New Hampshire shows Romney quickly waving the issue aside and hurrying on to another question.
Romney’s campaign counts on the fact that the public never hears of this group or his campaign’s covert connections to them. Few Americans—besides AFP readers who read about this in the Dec. 16, 2011, edition—have even heard of the fanatical, terrorist group, the Mujahedin-e Khalq (People’s Mujahedin of Iran; MEK or MKO). This is thanks to the big media’s general cover-up, and largely because it is an Israeli asset.
For months independent investigative journalists have asked Romney about his campaign’s ties to the MEK—but he never responds. No wonder, because if the American people ever found out about MEK, and the Romney campaign’s ties to it, they would demand he be tried for treason.
One of Romney’s chief advisers is neocon Mitchell Reiss. Reiss not only heads the 50-plus top neocons that lied America into the Iraq war—but he is also a leader in the stealth campaign for quietly removing MEK from the “Foreign Terrorist Organizations” (FTOs) list.
MEK was one of the first to be put on the FTO list because of its boasting of assassinations of U.S. servicemen, attacks on U.S. diplomats, murders of American citizens and suicide bombings. MEK was the only faction of Iranians who wanted to kill the American hostages in 1979. After the release of the Americans, the MEK went on a rampage and murdered possibly tens of thousands of Iranians in a decade-long terror campaign.
When George H.W. Bush, Donald Rumsfeld, Dick Cheney and other neocons gave germ warfare technology, poison gas and other chemical weapons to former Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein so he would invade Iran, MEK joined Saddam in slaughtering its fellow Iranians.
After Saddam fell, Washington ordered U.S. troops to protect MEK from the wrath of the Iraqis. George W. Bush gave MEK hundreds of millions of taxpayers’ dollars to commit terrorism in Iraq. Much of that money was spent on luxuries by MEK leaders in London and Paris.
MEK has bribed congressmen and other high officials with hundreds of thousands of dollars in speaker’s fees. Aiding and abetting MEK is still illegal. They get around this by using front groups and shells, laundering the money through speaker bureaus, high-dollar public relations outfits and law firms.
Another reason they want off the FTO list is they have thousands of followers in camps in Iraq and are no longer protected by U.S. troops, so they want to bring these trained killers and terrorists here.
Posted in: National News
What would you say if this had been Egypt that attacked an American ship in international waters? It was not Egypt, but israel that ried to sink this ship, reaqd on and see what happened. EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW: Survivor of Israeli Attack Reveals Secrets of 1967 High Seas Massacre
January 13, 2012 dave
By Victor Thorn
AMERICAN FREE PRESS and its predecessor, The Spotlight, are the only national newspapers that have regularly given coverage over the past quarter-century to the Israeli naval and air attack on the USS Liberty on June 8, 1967. During a Dec. 30, 2011 interview with Phil Tourney, a Liberty survivor and co-author of the book What I Saw That Day, the Navy veteran revealed to AFP one more bombshell that few have ever been willing to discuss about the duplicitous attack.
“Forty-four years after the fact, I can only come to one conclusion about what happened on June 8, 1967,” said Tourney. “The USS Liberty was set up by the U.S. government to be sunk by the Israeli military so that they could blame it on Egypt. After this attack, two American aircrafts were launched carrying nuclear-tipped missiles in order to bomb Cairo. That city was within three minutes of being obliterated. Without a doubt, it would have started WWIII.”
Tourney lived through what has become the greatest military cover-up and conspiracy in this nation’s history. Thirty-four crewmembers were killed during this Israeli assault, and 174 were wounded, most of them critically.
One of the subjects discussed during this interview was, what would happen if the American public finally had their eyes opened about this unmitigated act of war perpetrated by the nation of Israel.
“If the truth ever came out,” Tourney began, “it would change history and how people felt about the Israeli state. If the mainstream media devoted an entire week of stories to the USS Liberty and exactly what happened, the American people would be up in arms, begging for blood. Even though I’ve been accused of being an anti-Semite for trying to tell the truth, everyone should remember one important point—USS Liberty crewmembers didn’t murder anyone. The state of Israel did. The truth will change history.”
When asked to elaborate, Tourney said: “Things would change drastically in regard to Zionism. There would no longer be any money, aid or weaponry being sent to Israel. If people were interested enough to study this subject, they’d find out further that Adm. [Thomas] Moorer and Capt. Ward Boston wrote scathing articles to the Navy Board of Inquiry saying its report [on the Liberty] was a complete lie and sham.”
Tourney added that “Israel ruined many lives that day—not only survivors, but families that lost loved ones, too. Many of the wounded have long since died, taken their own lives, been thrown in prison or are messed up in the head.”
Today, Tourney’s feelings on how government officials turned their backs on him and his shipmates are heartfelt, sincere and poignant.
“It’s like parents hiring a hit man to kill you,” he added. “Then they go to the prison and spring your killer. That’s exactly what the U.S. government did to us. When they put a gun to our heads, they put a gun to everyone’s head.”
LEAD-UP TO THE ATTACK
As one of the self-described “walking wounded,” Tourney explained what transpired in the hours leading up to this pivotal event:
“On June 7, one day before the attack, I was aboard the Liberty, which was the world’s most sophisticated spy ship,” said Tourney. “We were heading toward the Mediterranean to monitor the Six-Day War so that we could communicate our findings directly back to the National Security Agency in Fort Meade. They received our communications immediately because we bounced microwave signals off the Moon.”
Only 20 years old at the time, Tourney took immense pride in his ship and its mission. He also felt safe in the supposed notion that Israel was our ally.
“I’d heard all through life how badly the Israelis had been treated,” he said. “I never knew any better. I never did any research. So, I believed it. But later I found out that historians were either wrong or they lied. Even on the morning of June 8 while on sound and security watch, I felt safe because our good friend Israel was protecting us. In the distance, I could see black smoke rising from bombs being dropped, yet gave little thought to being attacked, especially since large U.S. flags flying from the Liberty gave us cover.”
At 2 p.m. on June 8, Tourney’s life would be forever changed. His words are fueled by the sheer horror of what he endured that day:
“Jet aircrafts came in firing and strafing our ship,” he said. “Within minutes they took out hundreds of antennae and all of our .450-caliber machine guns. We were defenseless.”
But all those aboard were not without hope. Utilizing true American ingenuity and never giving up their fighting spirit, Tourney described a miraculous effort.
“About half-an-hour into the attack,” he said, “one of our men stretched a long wire so that we could transmit a message to the Sixth Fleet: ‘Under Attack by Unmarked Fighters. Send Help.’ A number of ships received this SOS, and soon Capt. Joseph Tully of the USS Saratoga ordered planes to rescue us.”
However, in an act that goes well beyond betrayal into the realm of full-fledged treason, Tourney laid out how Liberty became a ship without a country.
“Defense Secretary Robert McNamara contacted the Saratoga and recalled the fighters, telling them not to aid our ship,” he said. “But, showing true courage, Tully re-launched the jets, without authorization . . . After the second set of fighter jets were dispatched, the president of the United States—Lyndon Johnson—personally recalled them,” said Tourney.
Tourney says Johnson told Tully: “I don’t give a [expletive] if that ship goes to the bottom and every sailor is lost. We will not embarrass our ally, Israel.”
If the audacity of this heartless command wasn’t bad enough, Tourney interjected with his own appraisal of the situation.
“The only message we’d sent from the makeshift wire that had been strung was: ‘Attacked by unmarked aircraft’,” he added. “We never initially identified the attackers. So how did LBJ know Israel was behind the assault?”
Following a hellish two-hour attack where Israeli jets dropped napalm on Liberty, pierced its sides with 850 cannon holes and blasted open a gaping 40-foot-by-40-foot hole with torpedoes, a “prepare to abandon ship” order had been given. But Tourney tells what ensued: “The [Israelis] immediately shot our life rafts in the water. They sunk two of them and took a third aboard their boat as a trophy.”
When asked what he did in the aftermath, Tourney replied: “We kept looking for American help because we knew they got our message. But none ever arrived. So that night, I held a lantern as a doctor operated on my good friend Gary Blanchard. I could tell he wasn’t long for this world.. . . [T]he doctor cut Gary open from his chest to groin. . . . [H]is kidneys were shot up. He died a few moments later.”
AFP inquired as to Tourney’s state of mind at that moment, surrounded by death and chaos.
“You have to remember,” he began. “our ship had been on fire with napalm, and Liberty’s fuel tanks were burning. I was filled with rage and anger. We’re the greatest nation on Earth, and no one came to help. . . At that point I realized: We’re going to have to do this on our own. My biggest fear, though, was that the Israelis would return and finish us off. Plus, let’s be clear, every crewmember knew Israel was responsible, because we saw their flag on the torpedo boats.”
A day or two later as Liberty limped toward a port in Malta, Adm. Isaac Kidd assembled the survivors in small groups and, after removing his stars, demanded to know what occurred.
After learning the truth, a red-faced Kidd pinned his stars back on his uniform and said, “If any of you ever repeat a word, I’ll make sure you end up in the penitentiary, or worse,” Tourney said.
Stunned by these remarks, Tourney told AFP: “I thought he was going to say that America would make sure that Israel paid for what it did to us. But instead, I think the government hoped that our ship would sink before it ever reached Malta.”
Get Your Copy of What I Saw That Day: (softcover, 282 pages, #WIS, $30 plus $5 S&H) available from AFP’s FIRST AMENDMENT BOOKS. Call (888) 699-NEWS to charge. Send cash, check or money order to FAB, 645 Pennsylvania Avenue SE, #100, Washington, D.C. 20003.
——————————————————————————-
McCain, Bachmann Confronted Over ‘Incident’
By Victor Thorn
Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) knows the truth about what happened to the USS Liberty, because his father was directly involved in the cover-up. During a Jan. 4 interview with AFP, James Morris, the editor of a news and commentary website entitled “America Hijacked,” referenced a monumentally historical event when Liberty survivor Capt. Ward Boston approached McCain at a political fundraiser and told him he’d worked with his father.
According to Morris, McCain’s face abruptly turned white before he ushered Boston away and moved on to the next person in line.
“McCain and his admiral father covered up the USS Liberty attack on orders that came down from the highest corridors of the U.S. government,” Morris said. Liberty survivor Tourney agrees. “McCain has been part of the cover-up and knew exactly what happened to us,” Tourney said. “This fact has been documented since at least 1981. But his reaction leaves a lot to be desired. He claims: ‘It was a tragic mistake. Forget it. Get over it. Israel paid reparations.’ . . . McCain won’t tell people that most of the crewmen only received $200 or $250 in compensation.”
On Dec. 29, 2011, during a national radio broadcast from DesMoines, Iowa that was simulcast on C-SPAN, host Jan Mickelson had as his guest Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.), who at the time was still vying for the Republican presidential nomination. After a brief introduction and a few pleasantries, Mickelson took calls from his listeners.
The first to dial in was Morris, who addressed the guest with a taboo subject.
“I suggest Michele Bachmann do a Google search for Cindy McCain and the USS Liberty,” Morris told listeners to the radio show. “Israel is not an ally of America. They deliberately murdered American sailors and Marines on the USS Liberty on June 8, 1967. Michele Bachmann is willing to overlook that. She’s also spreading lies about Ron Paul, who is not going to put our country at risk militarily. Michele Bachmann is a neocon Israel firster. She’s willing to get us into World War III by initiating a war with Iran. [Iran’s president Mahmoud] Ahmadinejad never threatened to wipe Israel off the map.”
At this point, Mickelson abruptly cut off Morris and snidely remarked, “He’s on a Ron Paul rant there.” He then asked Mrs. Bachmann if she had any comments.
Completely ignoring all references to the Liberty, Mrs. Bachmann instead repeated a mantra indicative of her slavish devotion to Israel.
“I do believe Israel is our ally, and we need to stand for Israel,” she said.
Yet again, the unprovoked attack by a foreign power on an American ship remained the 800-pound gorilla in the room—ignored by the media and politicians that are supposed to stand with our servicemen against such hostil Media Accounts of Syrian Unrest Crafted to Twist Public Opinion
January 13, 2012 dave
By Richard Walker
Since the middle of 2011 the Western mainstream media has been parroting allegations of genocide in Syria at the hands of the country’s security forces. So far, the media has unquestioningly reported these claims, knowing full well that the sworn enemies of Syria’s current leader, Bashar al-Assad, have been the ones promulgating the stories. Guess who these enemies are? They include neocon war hawks in Israel and Washington, who have supported regime change in Syria since 2003, and their allies in Britain, France, Saudi Arabia and Qatar.
One prominent body, which has been the source for many of the headline-grabbing stories about Syria, is the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights in London, whose leaders have chosen to hide their identities. When the observatory fed a story to the Western media that the Syrian military had murdered one of its generals because he defected to run protests against the regime, no one checked with his family. Eventually, the general’s son had to show journalists a medical certificate confirming his father had died of kidney failure years ago, before anyone believed him.
A story that captured the most attention at the close of 2011 was one claiming massacres were taking place daily in the city of Homs, about 100 miles north of the capital, Damascus. The Observatory provided Western news outlets with regular updates, alleging Syrian troops were bombarding the city and were dug in all around it. It was claimed as many as 30 civilians had been shot dead in one day alone.
On Dec. 28, however, monitors from the Arab League visited Syria and traveled to Homs to check out the claims of massacres. Contrary to the stories, the monitors reported they found the atmosphere in Homs “reassuring” and announced that the Syrian government appeared to be in compliance with an agreed-upon peace plan between it and protesters throughout the country.
In many of the reports condemning the regime, there was no mention of the rebel outfits operating like lawless gangs across the country. Those gangs have been engaged in a deliberate campaign to destabilize Syria, and there is evidence they have been backed by Israeli and Western intelligence agencies.
In another report, the Syrian National Council, which is opposed to Assad, told media outlets that Arab League monitors who visited Homs had been duped. Council representatives made the ridiculous claim that the Syrian army had somehow swapped thousands of residents with regime supporters, who were then paraded in front of Arab monitors. This story was published in the mainstream without ever being fact-checked.
Americans should not forget that, in 2003, Congress gave the White House authority to attack Syria under the Syrian Accountability Act of 2003. It remains in force to this day, providing Barack Obama with the authority to wage a clandestine campaign to bring down Assad.
—— Richard Walker is the pen name of a former N.Y. news producer.
Posted in: National News
lities.
——
Victor Thorn is a hard-hitting researcher, journalist and the author of many books on 9-11 and the New World Order. These include 9-11 Evil: The Israeli Role in 9-11 and Phantom Flight 93 and Other Sept. 11 Mysteries Explored.
Posted in: National News
THERE ARE TWO ARTICLES TODAY RonPaul Should Be Proud to Be ‘Outside the Mainstream’ The Texas congressman is the only Republican presidential candidate who breaks decisively with the status quo. Jacob Sullum| January 4, 2012 Writing in www.reason.com "I don't think Ron Paul represents the mainstream," says Mitt Romney. Newt Gingrich, another of the Texas congressman's opponents in the contest for the Republican presidential nomination, uses stronger terms, declaring, "Ron Paul's views are totally outside the mainstream of virtually every decent American." As last night's resulting Iowa suggest, the "mainstream" to which Romney and Gingrich refers not defined by voters; it is the range of opinion deemed acceptable by leaders of the two major political parties. The mainstream has brought us a national debt the size of the national economy, a bloated yet over extended military that has strayed far from its mission of defending the country, and a lawless executive branch that usurps legislative powers and violates civil liberties. If that is what the mainstream represents, it is no place for decent Americans who support smaller government. Romney and Gingrich may think they are discrediting Paul, but they are actually recommending him as the only candidate who breaks decisively with the status quo. Although all of the Republican candidates pay lip service to fiscal restraint, Paul is the only one to proposes actual spending cuts, as opposed to smaller increases. His plan would balance the federal budget by 2015. By contrast, Romney aims to "put us on a path to a balanced budget," while Gingrich vaguely promises to "balance the budget by growing the economy, controlling spending, implementing moneysaving reforms, and replacing destructive policies and regulatory agencies with new approaches." The fiscal incontinence of the Republicans not named Paul is vividly illustrated by their attitude toward defense spending: More is always better, and any cuts, even if they are only reductions in projected increases, recklessly endanger national security. Romney assails "the Obama administration's irresponsible defense cuts," which would leave the Pentagon's budget bigger in a decade than it is today. The idea of going any further—say, reducing military spending to the amount appropriated in 2007, when the country was hardly helpless against its adversaries—is anathe mato Romney and Gingrich. In this atmosphere, Paul's insistence that "there's a difference between military spending and defense spending" is a breath of fresh air, and so are his warnings about the consequences of failing to make that distinction. Although his opponents try to isolate him by calling him an "isolationist," his views are more in tune with public opinion than theirs. Paul supported military action against Al Qaeda and its Taliban allies following the 9/11 attacks, but he opposed the occupation of Afghanistan, the invasion of Iraq, and the air war against Libya, saying the reoperations were not grounded in national defense. Recent polls indicate that two-thirds of Americans agree with his judgment about Afghanistan and Iraq, while up to three-fifths questioned the intervention in Libya. Are all of these people "outside the mainstream" as well? In addition to its role in military adventures, an elastic definition of national security is the main justification for the steady expansion of presidential power, which has accelerated in response to Islamicterrorism. The New York Times recently asked the presidential candidates, "Which executive powers, if any, claimed and exercised by the Bush and/or Obama administrations were unconstitutional?"Paul cited unauthorized wars, warrantless wiretaps, torture, indefinite detention of terrorism suspects, and the assassination of people the president unilaterally identifies as enemies. He said the excesses of George W. Bush's counterterrorism policies were "among the worst abuses of executive authority in the nation's history," adding that Bush's successor has been worse in some respects. None of the other candidates could think of a single instance in which Bush or Obama exceeded his authority in the name of fighting terrorism or protecting national security. Romney's chief example of unconstitutional executive action was the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, which is actually an example of unconstitutional legislative action. Gingrich said the problem is too little executive power, thanks to interference by the Supreme Court. If this is the mainstream, I want out. Jacob Sullum is a senior editor at Reason and a nationally syndicated columnist. Follow him on Twitter. © Copyright 2012 by Creators Syndicate Inc. t’s Tight in Iowa January 06, 2012dave • The long, strange road to the Iowa caucuses detailed • Top three candidates separated by small percentage By Victor Thorn With more plot twists than a daytime soap opera, the long, strange road leading to Iowa’s Jan. 3 caucuses has seen scandals, embarrassments, surprises and a jockeying for position among frontrunners that has been ever changing on a weekly basis. The big question that must be asked is: Have American voters been duped by the manipulative use of polls to prepare them to accept a candidate that has already been selected for them? Following John McCain’s disastrous 2008 presidential run, Mitt Romney immediately emerged as the 2012 frontrunner. With money, organization and name recognition, Romney has devoted the last decade of his life vying for the Republican nomination. With steadiness and an unflappable demeanor, pundits agree that it was his race to lose. However, an array of wild cards soon emerged to confound the situation. Namely, McCain’s vice presidential running mate Sarah Palin, New York City real estate mogul Donald Trump and New Jersey’s bombastic Gov. Chris Christie all considered throwing their hats in the ring to challenge Romney, whose “made for TV appearance” seemed a bit too certain. First out of the gates was Gov. Palin, who embarked on a glitzy bus tour that had media hounds considering the possibility of what would happen if this charismatic, extremely polarizing figure jumped in with guns a-blazing. But with high negative ratings, Mrs. Palin opted out. And who can forget last spring when Trump created headlines by none-too-subtly questioning Barack Obama’s legitimacy as president due to speculation concerning his alleged Kenyan birth? But with the release of a laughably-forged birth certificate on April 27, 2011, that many computer experts contend had been manipulated, Trump mysteriously dropped this hot-button issue. Par for the course, a compliant lapdog media demanded that this controversy had now been settled and was no longer news. Shortly thereafter, with his mission accomplished to set aside the “birther” debate, Trump assumed the role of a boorish commentator that repeated the same tired mantra on show after show. Finally, the hard-charging Chris Christie had to convince supporters, “Short of suicide, I don’t really know what I’d have to do to convince you people that I’m not running.” With these three political superstars now out of the picture, the field crystallized to prepare for a series of hotly contested debates that soon became characterized as a “reality TV show.” These showdowns coincided with an ongoing game of musical chairs that eventually allowed nearly every GOP candidate to assume the lead in various polls. Former Minn. Gov. Tim Pawlenty began the process by posing a short-lived challenge to Romney. But when Rep. Michele Bachmann (Minn.) won the Aug. 13 Ames, Iowa straw poll, she soon emerged as a media darling to the right, while members of the liberal press portrayed her as a flaky religious zealot. Bachmann’s slavish devotion to Israel didn’t endear her to those who are suspicious of Zionist control over the American media and political system. As if following a script, Texas Gov. Rick Perry’s entry into the race bumped Bachmann into a nosediving spiral from which she never recovered. Yet, Perry’s ineptitude soon became apparent as he made gaffe after gaffe. At one point during a debate he couldn’t name the three government agencies that he wanted to eliminate, while another “oops” moment led many to deduce that his intelligence level was even below that of George W. Bush’s—a scary notion, indeed. Adding to the furor was Perry’s bizarre executive order to have all 12-year-old girls in the state vaccinated with Gardasil, a cervical cancer vaccine. Perhaps the final nail in Perry’s coffin came when he enraged conservatives after declaring them “heartless” for not defending his policy of giving in-state tuition to illegal aliens. Perry’s crash-and-burn self-destruction facilitated the rise of black businessman and former Federal Reserve honcho Herman Cain, who championed a much-ballyhooed tax plan called 9-9-9. Although his tax plan was full of holes, Cain’s real problems arose when a string of women stepped forward to accuse the candidate of either sexually harassing them or engaging in extramarital affairs. Unable to withstand the heat, Cain bowed out and faded into obscurity. Along the way, GOP gatekeepers allowed former New Mexico Gov. Gary Johnson to participate in a handful of debates. Largely ignored, Johnson did land one memorable line when asked about the economy. He quipped, “My next-door neighbor’s two dogs have created more shovel-ready jobs than this current administration.” Regrettably, Republican bigwigs blackballed Johnson and refused to grant him a place on the debate stage, as they similarly did to former Louisiana Gov. Buddy Roemer. Johnson recently switched party affiliations and is now seeking the Libertarian nomination. With a new vacuum opened after Cain’s departure, Newt Gingrich surged to lead the pack. An arrogant elitist and ultimate Beltway insider—epitomized by a commercial where he sat beside Nancy Pelosi to promote global warming—Gingrich relished his role as the “smartest man in the room.” Soon, however, Gingrich went under the microscope for his close affiliation with Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, the U.S. government-sponsored mortgage giants. Romney also confronted Gingrich on his bizarre idea that America should establish lunar colonies to mine minerals. Gingrich also advocated using a complex arrangement of space mirrors to light U.S. highways. Fortunately, conservative infatuation with Gingrich waned in the following weeks, only to be filled—lo and behold—by another Israel-firster, former U.S. Sen. Rick Santorum (Pa.). As is Romney, Santorum is rabidly pro-military expansionist, pro-AIPAC and pro-Zionist. Santorum unabashedly advocates the launching of an unconstitutional American military attack on Iran and its nuclear capabilities that would undoubtedly begin World War III. Amid all this choreographed shuffling and razzle dazzle, Rep. Ron Paul (Texas) has remained an unwavering force to be reckoned with. The devotion among his core base was evident in Iowa, where only days prior to the caucuses he was cited as the odds-on favorite to achieve victory. An ardent constitutionalist, Federal Reserve foe and proponent of state’s rights, Paul is the only candidate that hasn’t been accused by his colleagues of being a flip-flopper. Or, as Paul has stated in numerous interviews: “I’ve been delivering the same message for 30 years. America is now finally catching up with me.” Last but not least, as AFP’s Michael Collins Piper has dutifully noted over the past few months, former Utah Gov. John Huntsman is being groomed to play a potential Ross Perot-style spoiler after coming under the tutelage of Lady Lynn Forester de Rothschild. If Huntsman decides to pursue this endeavor, it could mean the creation of a new internationalist party—something the world’s elites have been salivating over for many years now.
GOD IS ANGRY And He has good reasons
By Bill Gibbons
"These six things doth the Lord hate: yea, seven are an abomination unto Him: A proud look, a lying tongue, and hands that shed innocent blood, An heart that deviseth wicked imaginations, feet that be swift in running to mischief, A false witness that speaketh lies, and he that soweth discord among brethren" (PS. 6: 16-19. --- "God judgeth the righteous, and God is angry with the wicked every day. PS. 7:11.
YES! God is getting angry with the citizens of the world and He is punishing them for their evil deeds, which are many in the sight of God. We wonder if the world's citizens will ever get wise to the fact, that it is a BAD IDEA to have God angry with them. Will they ever learn, that God has rules and He expects His rules to be obeyed.
God says, the world is His and He alone has the power to do as He pleases with the world. God got so fed up with the Old World: that, in the days of Noah, He destroyed the entire world's population, with the exception of eight people. God destroyed the twin cities of Sodom and Gomorrah, because they had almost completely turned the cities in to the worst cities in existence at that time. The cities were overrun by perverts, that is homosexuals. Today, the United States is being turned into a state where perversion is fast becoming respectable as it must have been in Sodom and Gomorrah. God says this sin is an ABOMONITION to Him and He is getting angry with us for allowing this to happen.
Along about 33 A.D. the Romans, at the urging of the Jewish leaders, crucified God's Son, the Lord Jesus Christ. God got angry, but he was merciful to the nation and gave them another 40 years to repent of this worst of all sins. The nation did not repent, but instead persecuted His followers by jailing some and murdering others. GOD GOT ANGRY! He poured out His wrath against that nation and turned the Roman legions against the people. First century historians say, that every tree in Israel that would hold a Jew had a Jew hanging on the tree. Thousands of Jews were slaughtered and many thousands more were crucified. Many were sold into slavery and taken from the land of Israel.
Where does Israel stand with God today? To show you the answer to this question, we must go to the only one who has the answer to that question. That person is Almighty God Himself. To do this we turn to the Book of Romans and quote most of chapter eleven:
"I say then, Hath God castaway His people? God forbid. For I also am an Israelite, of the seed of Abraham, of the tribe of Benjamin.
2. God hath not cast away His people which He foreknew. Wot ye not what the Scripture saith of Elijah? how he maketh intercession to God against Israel, saying,
3. Lord, they have killed thy prophets, and digged down thine altars ; and I am left alone, and they seek my life.
4. But what sayeth the answer of God to Him? I have reserved to Myself seven thousand men, who have not bowed the knee to the images of Baal.
5. Even so then at this present time also there is a remnant according to the election of grace.
6. And if by grace, then is it no more works: otherwise grace is no more grace. But if it be of works, then it is no more grace: otherwise work is no more work.
7. What then? Israel hath not obtained that which he seeketh for; but the election hath obtained it, and the rest were blinded. (Here we see the beginning of problems for many modern Jews).
8. According as it is written, God hath given them the spirit of slumber, eyes that they should not see, and ears that they should not hear;) unto this day. (God did this, because they rejected His Son ,which He offered to them).
9. And Davis saith, Let their table be made a snare, and a trap, and a stumbling block, and a recompense unto them:
10. Let their eyes be darkened, that they may not see, and bow down their backs alway. (So David, a man they looked up to, says, they get what they deserve for what they have done).
11. I say then, Have they stumbled that they should fall? God forbid: but rather through their fall salvation is come unto the gentiles, for to provoke them to jealousy. (This is, as God knew it would work to provoke the Jews, but it did not lead them to Jesus Christ, it only hardened their hearts against God).
12. Now if the fall of them be the riches of the world, and the diminishing of them the riches of the Gentiles; how much more their fullness?
13: For I speak to you Gentiles, inasmuch as I am the apostle of the Gentiles, I magnify mine office:
14. If by any means I may provoke to emulation them which are my flesh, and might save some of them (Some Jews were indeed saved in Paul's day and a few may even be saved today, but very few).
15. For if the casting away of hem be the reconciling of the world, what shallthe receiving of them be, but life from the dead?
16. For if the firstfruit be holy, the lump is also holy: and if the root be holy, so are the branches.
17. And if some of the branches be broken off, and thou, being a wild olive tree wert grafted in among them and with them partake of the root and fatness of the olive tree:
18. Boast not against the branches. But if thou boast, thou bearest not the root, but the root thee.
19. Thou wilt say then, the branches were broken off, that I might be grafted in.
20. Well; because of unbelief they were broken off, and thou standest by faith. Be not high-minded, but fear: (Fear, because if you fall away from God as the Jews did, then you can be cut off from God the same as the Jew and that is exactly what is happening to the Gentile world today. We are turning our backs on the grace of God and that is a fatal mistake).
21. For if God spared not the natural branches (that is the Jews) take heed lest He also spare thee not. (God cut the Jew off from Him because of unbelief and they will remain cut off until the Lord returns and there is nothing anyone can do about it. To return to God, the Jew must repent, which most Jews refuse to do).
22. Behold therefore the goodness and severity of God: on them which fell, severity; but toward thee, goodness, if thou continue in hisgoodness: otherwise thou also shalt be cut off. (Most of the people of the world have already been cut off because of unbelief and that is why the world is on the brink of being placed under the New World Order, which will be a hell on earth. It will be hell on earth, because Satan will be in COMPLETE charge of the world).
23 And they also, if they abide not still in unbelief, shall be grafted in: for God is able to graff them in again. (We will remind you: That it is God that must graff them back in again. You cannot do that as long as they remain in unbelief. Many of you professing Christians treat the Jews as if he was something special, while God says the Jew is no longer His favorite. Today, the true believer, those redeemed by the Blood of Jesus Christ are Gods people and not the Jew.
(How can the Jew be a favorite of God, while he is teaching his children that Jesus Christ is not God, that Jesus Christ is not the Saviour; therefore leading his children to HELL FOREVER? Can God bless anyone that would lead his children to Hell? THE ANSWER IS A RESOUNDING NO!)
24. For if thou wert cut out of the olive tree which is wild by nature, and wert grafted contrary to nature into a good olive tree: how much more shall these, which be the natural branches, be grafted into their own olive tree? (Nothing is too hard for God, but to the natural mind He is saying it is much easier for Him to Graft the Jew back into the olive tree, then it was to graft the wild and evil gentile into the olive tree).
25. For I would not, brethren, that ye should be ignorant of his mystery, lest ye should be wise in your own conceits; that blindness in part is happened to Israel, UNTIL THE FULLNESS OF THE GENILES BE COME IN. (The Jew is still blind because he rejected the Saviour, Jesus Christ, and he will remain blind until the Saviour returns to lift that veil from his eyes).
26. And so all Israel shall be saved; as it is written, There shall come out of Sion the Deliverer, and shall turn away ungodliness from Jacob: For this is my covenant unto them, when I shall take away their sins" RO. 11:1-26.
Right now Israel is cut off from God and the Gentiles are in the are in the picture, but this will change when the Lord Jesus Christ returns to earth. The Jews will come back into favor with God and ALL Israel will be saved, but not until the Lord returns.
So then, we have seen that God destroyed the old world, Sodom and Gomorrah and Israel for one reason: Sin became so black in the eyes of God that He was forced to destroy them. It is easy to see, that the entire world is on the brink of suffering this same disaster. This coming calamity will be known as the Great Tribulation. The tribulation is the ultimate disaster the world is facing.
In the meantime, we see many smaller disasters and the disasters are becoming more common and more often as the people dive deeper into sin against God. If you have been watching disasters around the world, you will see that we have had more disasters in the last 10 years than we had in the 100 years before that. These so-called "natural disasters" are allowed by God to happen as His way of punishing a sinful people.
We have seen floods, earthquakes, tornadoes (one tornado practically wiped Joplin, MO off the map), hurricanes, like Katrina in New Orleans, tsunamis, like the one in the Pacific and the one in Japan, floods, and forest fires. These disasters have been happening all over the world, because the entire world has turned against God. To this humble writer, It is easy to see why God is getting angry and why He is allowing these disasters to occur.
It does not take a rocket scientist or a theological professor to see, that God is getting angry and when He gets angry disasters happen and this is His way of telling us we need to repent of our sins and turn to Jesus Christ as our Saviour. Unless we turn from our wicked ways, thing are not only going to continue as they have been for the last ten years, we can expect thing to get even worse in the next ten years.
What is the outlook for America in the coming years? DISMAL! Unless we change our way of living, God is going to allow us continue to slide into the GLOBAL PLANTATION, where there will only be lords and serfs and you know what most of us will be: That is those of us that are allowed to live.
Let us close with this bit of advice: Remember, there are very few politicians that can be fully trusted to look out for the best interest of the American people. Their loyalty is to the SUPER-RICH that pay for their elections and not to you, the voters.
The China Threat
It was during the 70's that we began to see China as the greatest threat to our nations security. That seems like a long time ago to many of you, but it became obvious to those of us in the know, that China was the nation to watch out for. Stay with us and you will see, that we know what we are talking about.
By this time we could no longer find electronic equipment that was made in the USA. RCA, General Electric, Motorola, Westinghouse, Zenith, etc. etc. etc., automobiles, appliances and you name it, all the plants had been moved offshore. Patriotic sources began to talk about the balance of payment with China, which made no sense to us, since China was a Communist nation and we were in the Cold War with Communist Russia, who was allied with China.
We lived in Anaheim, California, the home of Disney Land. This was considered by many across the country as the most conservative county in the nation. Our local paper, The Anaheim Bulletin, was owned by Howard Loudon, a staunch conservative and patriot extreme. The county paper was owned by Freedom Newspapers with a Libertarian viewpoint. We also had, in Washington, the nation's best Congressman, James B. Utt and many of us received his very informative news letter each month.
My wife and I belonged to a conservative club, that had some of the county's most conservative people as members. Our most distinguished member was Walter Knott, the founder of Knot's Berry Farm in Buena Park, CA., next to Anaheim and Mr. Knott attended our meetings most of the time. We had several doctors, a few lawyers and other distinguished people as members. Major Jim Townsend, publisher of the National Educator and president of Save Our Republic, an organization working to expose the Federal Reserve System was a faithful member. This was at a time, when most people, even many conservatives, thought the bank was indeed a Federal Bank. We were very well informed and knew what was going on, but many of us did not know who was behind the problems. It took several years for the truth to sink into our slow thinking minds. Since that time we have discovered, that conservatives and professing Christians are some of the most easily fooled people in the country
We began to hear about the balance of payment between the U.S. and China and it was in favor of China. This meant, that they were selling us a lot more stuff, then we were selling them. This made no sense to us, since Communism was the enemy; we wondered why we would be helping the Chinese.
Along about this time, we began to see, that the owners and directors of the national corporations were moving our factories to China, costing us thousands of good paying jobs and making ghost towns out of the northern cities, like Detroit and Flint Michigan. We also discovered that the Democrats, "the working man's friend," did nothing to stop this exodus of our jobs. We also discovered, that Congress, both political parties, was giving these giant corporations a tax break for moving these jobs out of the country. By now many of us began to smell a RAT!.
We fought back against what was happening with all this merchandise being sold in American stores. Some freedom loving people started going around to the stores that sold Chinese merchandise and putting little notes in the pockets and other places saying to buy this stuff was to support communism.
Here they ran into a buzz saw, because the same people that was importing this stuff from Communist China, belonged to the same small group that owned the major stores that was selling this stuff. Some of our people were arrested for placing these notes in among the merchandise. The major media was against people doing his and came down hard on the people caught placing these notes among the stuff. This caused a lot of people to question the goals of the media even more. Some of us thought back to the days when the media was fighting against Sen. McCarthy and his effort to get the communist out of the State Department.
Most of those involved did not see the full picture, because it takes time to study all the issues and to put all the pieces together. It took us many years of study to see that there was indeed a conspiracy to destroy our economy and turn this nation into a third world nation. We discovered this in the early 60's, before the Internet was introduced.
Next we had to learn that the conspirators belonged to a very, very small group; a group so small, that they were INVISIBLE to most people. We have been informed by people on the fringe area of this group, that, there are no more than 300 super-rich families causing all the problems for the rest of the entire world. Think about that, 300 families with enough money to buy enough politicians to make slaves of over 400 billion people of all nationalities, countries and religions.
These 300 families make up, what we know as the BILDERBERGS. Each year for the last 60 some years, 120-to-150 of the SUPER-RICH meat once a year in a secluded spot and plan how they are going to rule the world. One of their goals was to bring all the nations of Europe into one large government. They had planned to do this with the Soviet union, but a little fellow in German, with a funny looking mustache, stopped them.
That was when they decided on the present approach. First they would organize the European Union, then the American Union, and then the Asian Union and this is where China comes into the picture. The would be world rulers would rather deal with three different governments, then hundreds of nations states and providences. In order to accomplish this, the rulers must destroy the U.S. economy, while making billions of dollars for themselves and prepare the people to settle for anything just to survive.
On this web site we have showed you, that the super-rich in America and in Europe financed the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia. We showed you that the Rothschild family led the way and the rest of the super-rich followed, the Rockefellers, Schiff's, Loebs, Harriman's and others. Today, the descendants of these Communist supporters are carrying on the dream of their fathers and continue to march us into slavery on A GLOBAL PLANTATION, where there will only be lords and serfs and you know what most of us will be .Many of us will not be allowed to live on this PLANTATION, because the new rulers will kill us to make the world a safe place for them to rule. This is what the communist did in the old Soviet Union and in all communist countries. In Cambodia, under Pol Pot, it has been estimated that the communist killed one third of the people.
In the Soviet Union and in Communist China, millions of poor souls were murdered or allowed to die of starvation just to satisfy these evil bastards lust for blood. A human life means nothing to them, just as long as they win in the end. To these evil people, the entire world could perish and it would not bother them at all. Of course that would be no fun, they want to rule over the Gentile world and see them bow and scrape just to stay alive.
Of course our own government is not much better in some ways. At the end of WW II, we allowed over a million German POW's to die of diseases and starvation in an open field. More German POW's died in this prison camp, then were killed in combat. You can thank Eisenhower and Harry Truman for this blight on our nation. We hung Germans and Japanese for crimes such as this one, while we re-elected Truman as president and later elected Eisenhower president. Both were war criminals and should have been hung along with the Germans and Japanese.
Back to the subject at hand: Harry, the buck stops here, Truman sold out the Chinese Nationalists and allowed the communist to take over in China.
During WW II, the American officials that we sent to China to report on the war and to aid the Chinese Nationalists in their battle against Japan, reported back to Washington, that the Chinese Nationalist were not trying to defeat the Japanese, but rather favored the Japanese and the Chinese communist were doing all the fighting. Of course this was a lie and our government leaders knew it was a lie.
Sitting in the Treasury Dept. was a known communist, Harry Dexter White, who was supposed to be sending money to the Chinese to fight the Japanese, but he was with- holding this vital aid to China. When WW II ended, we soon cut off all aid to China and the communist, with aid from Russia, easily defeated the Chinese Nationalists Chinese, Retired general George Marshall, the Army Chief of Staff in Dec.,1941, was now the Secretary of State and he once said: "With the stroke of my pin, I disarmed Chaing Kai Shek." Chaing was the leader of China at that time. We allowed the Chinese communist to take possession of the war material that the Japanese left behind, to be used against the Nationalists Chinese. So you can see that our unelected rulers, the SUPER-RICH ZIONIST, have been for China all the time.
During the reign of Jimmy Carter, who by-the-way professes to be a Christian and that probably helped get him elected, gave away our own Panama Canal with the help of both political parties. And, who is in charge of the Panama Canal today? You guessed it, communist China our sworn enemy.
So, it is easy to see that we have supported the communist in China for many years and we are supporting them now, by building up their economy at the expense of our own economy. Politicians of both political parties are equally guilty in this treasonous action.
Most people will not agree with us, but we say: THAT WE ARE NO LONGER THE GOOD GUYS! Sure we have the best form of government, the world has ever seen, but that government has been taken over by criminals. Both political parties are involved in this criminal activity.
We could see the handwriting on the wall away back in the early 70's. At that time, we said, that China could easily land in Mexico and invade this country from there without having to land on our beaches, because Mexico is a communist country . Today, we believe they will not have to invade at all, but will be able to walk in and take over the country as part of the New World Order.
China is fast becoming the new powerhouse kid on the block. In 10-20 years they will be the most powerful nation in the world, both militarily and economically and it is all because of the 300 SUPER-RICH Zionist Jews that are virtually running the world already. 300 families that have been the movers and shakers behind communist ever since their forefathers sponsored the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia.
Wake up people and get to know the real enemy and quit listening to the judas goats that are pretending to be your friends. People like Rush Limbaugh, who profess to be pro-American, while he is actually a mouth piece for the Zionist bankers and their friends. You don't think so, then just try and get him to talk about the Bilderbergs, the Federal Reserve Banks or the Obama birth certificate. But, for that matter, just try and get anyone in Congress to talk about the Obama birth certificate. That is something that even Ron Paul will not discuss. Yes my friends, you do not have any friends in Congress, no matter how good they sound. When push comes to shove, Congress will do as their masters, the Zionist bankers and their friends want them to do.
A shameful year
POSTED BY JUDSON PHILLIPS | DECEMBER 19, 2011
Jim DeMint of South Carolina called it a shameful year. He was right.
As Congress wrapped up the spending bills for this year, Democrats decided early on they were going to hang tough and they would not agree to any spending cuts. They also knew the Republicans have no stomach for a fight.
Republicans in Congress, along with their enablers, the Democratic majority in the Senate, passed a $1 trillion budget bill -- and most Congressional Republicans did not even know what was in it.
Where was the Tea Party?
A year ago, the Tea Party swept liberals out of power in Congress. The Republicans came into power with the promise of making changes. They were going to defund Obamacare and were going to cut spending.
A funny thing happened on the way to power. Republicans did nothing.
Now, they have passed an omnibus spending bill. Despite the promise not to put together these massive bills, they did. Despite their promise to have bills available for 72 hours, this bill was rushed through.
Despite promises to cut spending, all of the liberal programs such as Obamacare, Dodd-Frank, the EPA and, well, the list goes on, got their money. Not only did the Republicans not cut spending, spending is actually up under the Republican Congress.
Can someone please tell me why the Tea Party supported the Republicans?
Perhaps the Republicans need to learn something.
In 2000, the American people gave the GOP control of the White House as well as Congress. By 2006, Americans were so disgusted with Republicans acting just like Democrats that they put the Democrats back in charge.
In 2008, the elections results for the Republicans were akin to Custer’s last stand except Custer might have fared a little better. In 2010, the Republicans roared back because the Tea Party came into existence and supported them.
The Republicans did what Republicans always do. They told us they would be conservatives and then went to Washington and acted like liberals.
There were a few who did not. Marco Rubio, the great Senator from Florida voted no. Ted Poe, the great Congressman from Texas did not support this monstrosity either.
The shameful year for the GOP is over. With the establishment doing its best to strangle the conservative movement and give us Mitt Romney as President, the GOP is not learning.
If the GOP is not willing to learn this lesson, perhaps it will learn another lesson. Political parties are not immortal. If they do not respond to the will of the people, they simply became historical footnotes.
The “GinGrinch” Steals Christmas
December 16, 2011 admin
By Ralph Forbes
Republican presidential hopeful Newt Gingrich is much nastier than the Grinch of children’s storybook fame, who only disguised himself as Santa to ruin Christmas. Gingrich is a moral leper who fleeced taxpayers for millions of dollars and wants to start World War III by attacking Iran.
Gingrich has been naughty not nice, so we’re making a list and checking it twice.
For helping Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac destroy the economy, costing millions of Americans their jobs and homes, “The GinGrinch” was paid $1.6 million to oppose those who wanted to stop these taxpayer-guaranteed loans. On April 24, 2007—just before the collapse—Gingrich said: “I think conservatives should embrace and want to extend (these sub-prime loans) as widely as possible.” In 2008, three-quarters of all home loans in the U.S. were guaranteed by taxpayers through Freddie Mac.
Gingrich also supported bailing out Wall Street, but later lied about it, saying: “I’m not for bailing them out. In fact, I’m for breaking them up.” Actually, Gingrich did support the $700 billion taxpayer “TARP” bailout—of which $150 billion went to Freddie Mac and friends.
Gingrich then lied about forcing you to buy from healthcare corporations that bribe Congress. He claimed he only supported the mandate in 1993, as an alternative to “Hillarycare.” Yet as recently as 2007, Gingrich wrote this: “Congress must do more, including passing legislation to . . . require anyone who earns more than $50,000 a year to purchase health insurance. . . .” Gingrich got big bucks from Big Pharma.
Gingrich denies he supported Obama’s skyrocketing energy cost cap-and-trade swindle. But Gingrich wrote: “I think if you have mandatory carbon caps combined with a trading system . . . and if you have a tax incentive program for investing in the solutions, that there’s a package there that’s very, very good. And frankly it’s something I would strongly support.”
Gingrich swears he is not a lobbyist. The mainstream media lets him get away with lying about it.
If Gingrich gets in the White House, he will turn the country into a coast-to-coast real-life nightmare a la Frank Capra’s vision of Pottersville, the fictional alternative reality in the movie It’s a Wonderful Life.
As for me, all I want for Christmas is for Gingrich and all the neocons to volunteer for the frontlines in Afghanistan and all the other countries they want America to attack. I want someone like Ron Paul to win the White House and bring America’s sons and daughters safely home. I want to solve our money problems by getting rid of the banksters’ privately owned Federal Reserve.
That’s not too much to ask, is
PHONY FBI TERROR PLOTS GARNER INCREASED INERNATIONAL SCRUTINY
By Bill White
On Nov. 18 Jose Pimentel, an American citizen from the Dominican Republic, was arrested in New York and charged with constructing a pipe bomb. A federal informant who had been monitoring him sat by, giving him directions, having already instructed Pimentel to attack an American target in revenge for the assassination of American Islamic cleric Anwar al-Awlaki. Reuters and other news agencies immediately met reports of the plot with skepticism, especially after they said Pimentel bought his bomb-making materials while accompanied by the informant, who eventually caused his arrest.
This incident was the latest in a series of bogus terror arrest hat has drawn the attention of international media sources, particularly Britain's Guardian Newspaper, which ran a Nov.16 expose on increasing governmental efforts to fabricate terror incidents in order to generate fear that can be used to control the American people.
The Guardian report followed a study by the University of California at Berkeley showing that only three of the hundreds of terror plots investigated by the United States may have an existence independent of the FBI. Federal informants have been scouring the country trying to create incidents in order to help the careers of U.S. attorneys and justify excessive American expenditure on anti-terror campaigns.
The FBI has 10,000 field agents on its payroll, and each of those agents is required to have at least four informants working for him full time, manufacturing crimes, in exchange for a paltry $400 a week, plus up to $2,0000 bonus if their lies lead to a conviction. On average, each FBI agent maintains approximately 10 such informants, meaning that 100,000 Americans on the FBI payroll do nothing with their day but manufacture criminal conspiracies. The U.S. marshals, DEA, Immigration and Customs Enforcement and BATF maintain similar programs, meaning that as many as half a million Americans are earning a full-time living attempting to lure other Americans into criminal acts, only to be prosecuted by the government.
"Legally, you have to use the word 'entrapment' very carefully. I it is a very strict term." said Karen Greenberg, a professor at Fordham University.
nder U.S. law, all FBI agents has to do in order to "sting" someone for a terror plot is show that he was "predisposed" to commit acts of terrorism. To qualify as predisposed, all one must do is express a strong opinion either opposing the U,S, government or supporting an ideology the government believes is opposed to it. Thus, if a person were to express a strong belief in Islam, that would be sufficient for U.S. domestic intelligence forces to suggest that that person commit a terrorists act, then provide him with items necessary o carry out the act.
Generally, the FBI tries to lure victims into conspiracies, in which several people with similar ideas are brought together and persuaded to commit a crime in unison--a maneuver that means that no actual ability to carry out the attack need be present. But, sometimes, the FBI is unable to bring a group of people together, in which case it manufactures the crime by providing explosives--or explosive materials and instructions--to its victim, and then arrest him.
Don't fail to read the second article by Bill White about the government sting operations and the phony terrorists plots.
NEW WORLD ORDER LOBBY PROMOTING GINGRICH
By Michael Collins Piper
Do you like Newt Gingrich? So do the Zionist Bankers and their friends ED.)
Even though there was no evidence of it, the elite media announced that the presidential campaign of former House Speaker Newt Gingrich was picking up steam and gave his ambitions a critical boost. This was no surprise to those who know Gingrich has a longstanding ties to powerful circles outside the realm of the grassroots voters.
In 1968, when conservatives were backing Richard Nixon or then-California Gov. Ronald Reagan for the GOP presidential nomination, Gingrich was a Southern campaign coordinator for the liberal internationalist Gov. Nelson Rockefeller of New York.
Although Gingrich now touts himself as a conservative, he remains a fervent New World Order globalists and a longtime advocate of U.S. military adventurism abroad and destructive so-called free trade policies. In fact, it was Gingrich who helped railroad the discredited North American free Trade Agreement through Congress.
A member of the Rockefeller-financed Council on Foreign Relations, the New York affiliate of the royal Institute of International Affairs, the policy apparatus of the Rothschild banking empire, Gingrich is particularly close to hard-line pro Israel forces on American soil.
One of his chief foreign policy advisors is Ilan Berman, editor of the journal of the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs (JINSA), the U.S.-based operation said by Prof. Edward Hermann of the University of Pennsylvania to be a "virtual agency of the Israeli government."
Best known for its front-line role through asserts in the George W. Bush administration in misdirecting the United States into the debacle in Iraq and now continuing o clamor for war against Iran, JINSA has several of its key figures--including JINSA's founder, Stephen Byren, and his close associates Richard Perle and Paul Wolfowitz--investigated by the FBI on suspicion of conducting espionage for Israel.
Gingrich--who has overseen a network of political enterprises that have brought an estimated $100 million into his coffers since he left Congress--has been favored by one donor in particular: Las Vegas gambling tycoon Sheldon Adelson a devoted supporter of Israel, who once described himself as "the richest Jew in the world." This modern incarnation of crime boss Meyer Lansky bankrolled Gingrich to the tune of at least $6 million.
While in Congress, Gingrich benefited from the activities of his (second) wife, Marianne, then on the payroll of the Israel Export Development Company (IEDCO), promoting the importation of Israeli products into the United States--even as Gingrich used his influence in Congress o advance U.S.-Israel trade.
IEDCO was the brainchild of Larry Silverstein, the billionaire owner of the World Trade towers at the time 0f the 9-11tradgey, best known for urging, "pull it"--in reference to the trade center's Building 7, which was deliberately imploded--as 9-11 researchers have documented relentlessly.
Silverstein even admitted to The Wall Street Journal that Gingrich was one of a number in Congress who lobbied to support Silverstein's ventures. This happened at a time when Gingrich's wife was on Sliverstein's payroll.
Mrs. Gingrich's IDEACO deal was cut in 1994 after she and Newt traveled to Israel at the expense of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, a lobby for Israel.
Although she took a monthly salary of $2,500, plus "commissions," Mrs. Gingrich refused to disclose he size of the commissions. the sums she received are of the level seen an many bribery scandals.
On Jan. 25, 1985, a front page story in The Spotlight unmasked Gingrich--then a little-known junior House member and the leader of a clique of Republicans, the Conservative Opportunity Society (CCOS)--as the driving force behind a scheme to scrap the GOP's historic nationalist stance on foreign policy.
The Spotlight revealed that Gingrich and several other CIS members--including then Rep. Vin Weber (R-Minn.)--had attended a secret meeting with Donald Graham, publisher of The Washington Post, at which Gingrich and the COS agreed to use their influence to push the GOP into the international camp. In return, the Post's power-wielders promised to give Gingrich and his collaborators wide and favorable publicity. Until then, the media had relegated Gingrich and company to back-bench status, painted as extremists.
Gingrich told the Post the COS would--and they did--call for sanctions against white-ruled South Africa, a reversal of the traditional conservative stand, a move that helped bring down that government and which resulted in South Africa turning its nuclear arsenal over to Israel--a little known secret hen and now.
Soon--as promised-- the Post published a laudatory profile of Gingrich, one of many future puff pieces.
Then, Gingrich's colleague, Weber, authored a Post column openly calling for the GOP to become "America's new international party."
The Spotlight was shouted down by conservatives hoodwinked by the big media into following Gingrich's brand of 'leadership." Ultimately, however, the secret Post-Gingrich meeting was confirmed by the Post--but only after Gingrich had reached a position of influence. The Spotlight's "conspiracy theory"--as some called it--proved to be a conspiracy fact.
On Sept.3, 1995 the Post pointed out that "for the ultra-right, Gingrich is just a tool of the world government plot." The Post said "anyone who glances at The Spotlight ... knows .... Gingrich is hardly the leader of their movement, in their eyes, he is [subverting]it."
According to the Post: "Those with a paranoid bent are convinced that the Georgian is in cahoots with President Clinton, the Rockefellers, the Freemasons, the Council on Foreign Relations and the entire eastern establishment to abrogate the Constitution and forge a New World Order under the thumb of the Jewish central bankers and the UN."..
More than a decade later, that sarcastic assessment of Gingrich stands perhaps more true than ever.
PHONY FBI TERROR PLOTS GARNER INCREASED INERNATIONAL SCRUTINY
By Bill White
On Nov. 18 Jose Pimentel, an American citizen from the Dominican Republic, was arrested in New York and charged with constructing a pipe bomb. A federal informant who had been monitoring him sat by, giving him directions, having already instructed Pimentel to attack an American target in revenge for the assassination of American Islamic cleric Anwar al-Awlaki. Reuters and other news agencies immediately met reports of the plot with skepticism, especially after they said Pimentel bought his bomb-making materials while accompanied by the informant, who eventually caused his arrest.
This incident was the latest in a series of bogus terror arrest hat has drawn the attention of international media sources, particularly Britain's Guardian Newspaper, which ran a Nov.16 expose on increasing governmental efforts to fabricate terror incidents in order to generate fear that can be used to control the American people.
The Guardian report followed a study by the University of California at Berkeley showing that only three of the hundreds of terror plots investigated by the United States may have an existence independent of the FBI. Federal informants have been scouring the country trying to create incidents in order to help the careers of U.S. attorneys and justify excessive American expenditure on anti-terror campaigns.
The FBI has 10,000 field agents on its payroll, and each of those agents is required to have at least four informants working for him full time, manufacturing crimes, in exchange for a paltry $400 a week, plus up to $2,0000 bonus if their lies lead to a conviction. On average, each FBI agent maintains approximately 10 such informants, meaning that 100,000 Americans on the FBI payroll do nothing with their day but manufacture criminal conspiracies. The U.S. marshals, DEA, Immigration and Customs Enforcement and BATF maintain similar programs, meaning that as many as half a million Americans are earning a full-time living attempting to lure other Americans into criminal acts, only to be prosecuted by the government.
"Legally, you have to use the word 'entrapment' very carefully. I it is a very strict term." said Karen Greenberg, a professor at Fordham University.
Under U.S. law, all FBI agents has to do in order to "sting" someone for a terror plot is show that he was "predisposed" to commit acts of terrorism. To qualify as predisposed, all one must do is express a strong opinion either opposing the U,S, government or supporting an ideology the government believes is opposed to it. Thus, if a person were to express a strong belief in Islam, that would be sufficient for U.S. domestic intelligence forces to suggest that that person commit a terrorists act, then provide him with items necessary o carry out the act.
Generally, the FBI tries to lure victims into conspiracies, in which several people with similar ideas are brought together and persuaded to commit a crime in unison--a maneuver that means that no actual ability to carry out the attack need be present. But, sometimes, the FBI is unable to bring a group of people together, in which case it manufactures the crime by providing explosives--or explosive materials and instructions--to its victim, and then arrest him.
CRITICS OF 9-11 TRUTH LAVK CRDENIALSBy Paul Craig Roberts
The critics of 9-11 truth: Do not have a case? Answer to the question is no. The 9-11 truth critics have nothing but ad hominem arguments. Let's examine the case against the truthers presented by Ted Rall, Ann Barnhardt and Alexander Cockburn. But first let's define who the truthers are.
The Internet has made it possible for anyone to have a web site and to rant and speculate to their heart's content. There are a large number of 9-11 conspiracy theorists. Many on both sides the issue are equally ignorant. Neither side has any shame about demonstrating ignorance. Both sides of the issue have conspiracy theories. Sept. 11 was a conspiracy whether a person believes that it was an inside job or that a handful of Arabs in a cave in Afghanistan outwitted the entire intelligence apparatus of the Western World and the operational response of NORAD and the Air Force.
For one side to call the other conspiracy theorists is the pot calling the kettle black. The question turns not on name calling but on evidence.
The 9-11 Truth movement was created in part by professional architects and engineers some of whom are known for having designed steel high-rise buildings. It was created in part by distinguished scientists, such as University of Copenhagen nano-scientists Niels Harriot, who has 60 scientific papers to his credit, and physicists Steven Jones. It was created in part by Air Force pilots and commercial airline pilots who are experts at flying airplanes. It was created in part by firefighters who were in the twin towers and who personally heard and experienced numerous explosions, including explosion in the sub-basements. It was created in part by members of 9-11 families who desire to know how such an improbable set of events as 9-11 could possible occur.
The professionals and the scientists are speaking from the basis of years of experience and expert knowledge. Moreover, the scientists are speaking from the basis of careful research into the evidence that exists. When an international research team of scientists spends 18 months studying the components in the dust from the towers and the fused pieces of concrete and steel, they know what they are doing. When they announce they have definite evidence on incendiaries and explosives, you can bet your life they have the evidence.
When a physicists proves that Building 7 fell at free fall speed and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), which accepts the government version, has to acknowledge that he is correct, you can bet your life the Physicists is correct.
When fire dept. captains and clean up teams report molten steel and their testimony is backed up with photographs--in the debris of the ruins weeks and months after he buildings' destruction, you can bet your life the molten steel was there. When the same authorities report pumping fire suppressants and huge quantities of water with no effects on the molten steel, you can bet your life that the temperature long after the buildings' destruction remained extremely high, far higher than any building fire can reach.
When he architects, engineers and scientists speak, they offer no theory of who is responsible for 9-11. hey sate that the known evidence supports neither the NIST reports nor the 9-11 Commission Reports. They say that the explanations that the government has provided is demonstrably wrong and that an investigation is required if we are to discover the truth about the events.
It is not a conspiracy to examine the evidence and to state that the evidence does not support the official exploitation that has been given.
What is the position of the government's critics? Ted Rall says: "Everything I've read and watched on truther sites is easily dismissed by anyone with a basic knowledge of physics and architecture. (I spent three years in engineering school.)"
Ann Barnhardt writes: "I gotta tell you, I've just about had it with these 9-11 truthers. If there is one phenomenon in our sick culture that sums up how far gone and utterly damaged we are as a people, it is 9-11 trutherism. It pretty much covers everything: self loathing, anti-Semitism, zero knowledge of rudimentary physics and a general inability to think logically."
She goes downhill from here.
Amazing, isn't she? Physic professors have "zero knowledge of rudimentary physics." Internationally recognized logicians have "a general inability to think logically." People trained in the scientific method who use it to seek truth are "self-loathing." If you doubt the government's account you are anti-Semitic. Mrs. Barnhardt then provides her readers with a lesson in physics, structural architecture and engineering, and the behavior of steel under heat and stress is the most absolute nonsense imaginable.
Obviously, Mrs. Barnhardt knows nothing at all about what she is talking about, but, overflowing with hubris, she dismissed real scientists and professionals with ad hominem arguments. She adds to her luster with a video of herself tearing out pages of the Koran, which she has marked with slices of bacon, and burning the pages.
Now we come to Alex Cockburn. He is certainly not stupid. I know him. He is pleasant company. He provides interesting intellectual conversation. I like Him. Yet, he also arrogantly dismisses highly qualified experts who provide evidence contrary to the official government story of 9-11.
Unlike Rall and Barnhardt, Cockburn does refer to evidence, but it is second-or-third-hand here say evidence that is nonsensical on its face.
For example, Cockburn writes that Chuck Spinney "tells me that 'there are pictures taken of the 757 plane hitting the Pentagon--they were taken by the surveillance cameras at Pentagon's heliport, which was right next to the impact point. I have seen them both--stills and moving pictures. I just missed seeing it personally, butt the driver of the van I just got out of in South Parking saw it so closely that he could see the terrified faces of passengers in windows."
If there were pictures or videos of an airliner hitting the Pentagon, they would have been released years ago. they would have been supplied to the 9-11 Commission. Why would the government refuse for 10 years to release pictures that proves its case? The FBI confiscated all film from all surveillance cameras. No one has seen them, much less a Pentagon critic such as Spinney.
I have to say the van driver must have better eyes than an eagle if he could see expressions on passengers faces through those small portholes in a plane traveling around 500 miles per hour.
How can Rall, Mrs. Barnhardt or Cockburn pass judgment on a nano-chemists with 40 years experience and 60 scientific publications to his credit? They cannot, but nevertheless do. They don't hesitate to pass judgment on issues about which they have no knowledge or understanding. This is an interesting psychological phenomenon, worthy of study and analysis.
Another interesting phenomenon is the strong emotional reaction that many have to 9-11, and events about which they have little actual information. Even the .lead members of the 9-11 Commission itself have said that information was withheld from them and the commission was set up to fail. People who rush to the defense of NIST do not even know what they are defending, as NIST refuses o release the details of the simulation upon which it bases its conclusion.
On the one hand there are credentialed experts who demonstrate problems in the official account, and on the other hand there are non-experts who denounce the experts as conspiracy kooks . The experts are cautious and careful about what they say, and heir detractors have thrown caution and care to the wind. That is a state of the debate.
"WE HAVE THE GREATEST SYSTEM OF GOVERNMENT EVER DEVISED BY MAN. UNFORTUNATLEY THE GOVERNMENT HAS BEEN TAKEN OVER AND IS BEING RUN BY CRIMINALS" - Latino Smith.
THREE VERY GOOD ARICLES
POSTED TODAY
The American Free Press, 645
Pennsylvania Avenue SE,
Suite 100, Washington, D.C.
20003
1-202-544-5977. www.americanfreepress.net
Monday, November 21. 2011
TWO ARTICLES
GLOBALISTS FEAR RISE IN
NATIONALISM
By Mark Anderson
Washington D.C.--American
Free Press has learned that
the globally minded World
Affairs Councils of America
(WACA) and members of its 93
local World Affairs Council
chapters across the nation
are concerned that the
economic downturn is giving
way to a resurgence of
nationalism--and a strong
distaste among American
voters for more never-ending
wars.
WACA, comprised of or
affiliated with highly
influential policymakers who
are financially well heeled
and set the tone and
direction of the nation,
convened Nov. 2-4 at
Washington's plus Mayflower
Hotel and welcomed Sen. John
McCain (R-ARIZ.) and
longtime foreign policy
figure Zbginiew Brzezinski,
among several other
notable speakers.
McCain was straightforward
about what most WACA members
see as a worrisome
development--voters and
presidential candidates
de-emphasizing foreign
policy issues--which is
actually translating into a
decline of the warfare state
due to domestic economic
distress.
Several WACA speakers,
officers and chapter members
were quick to use the touchy
word "isolationism"
throughout most of the
three-day conference. McCain
opined, "If we withdrew from
fortress America, it doesn't
make another attack [like
9-11] on the U.S.
less likely," which
drew considerable applause.
McCain's appearance and that
of Brzezinski,
both on Nov. 4 attracted
area media that day, but
only American free Press
fully covered the WACA
conference. there, AFP
learned that NATO's
first-ever major summit in
Chicago would take place in
May 2012.
Notably. NATO was a chief
sponsor of the WACA
conference, along with
Goldman Sachs, Raytheon,
EXXON-Mobile, Northrop
Grumman, Chevron etc.
McCain, who was quick to
sound the alarm about Iran's
alleged nuclear ambitions,
indicated that the West must
continue fighting the
ongoing terrorists threats
posed by al Qaeda and the
Taliban.
This writer caught up with
McCain when he hurriedly
departed the hotel to ask
him whether heavily armed
Mexican drug cartels
constituted actual terrorism
and whether U.S. troops
being in their homeland to
combat cartel activity at
the border might be a worthy
example of "fortress
America" actually making
America safer.
He declined to answer
directly except to say that
he liked the general concept
of "sending in National
Guard troops." he added,
"Check out Sen. Jon Kyl's
(R-AZ) 10-point border
plan."
Before the end of his WACA
remarks, McCain admitted
things look rather bleak in
terms of satisfying he WACA
conference theme: "U.S.
National Security: Six Top
Issues for the 2012
Elections," wherein
virtually all concerns are
framed in a global context.
"Americans are worried about
their jobs and staying in
their homes," McCain said,
:So I understand why lot of
Americans have become
isolationist." He's aware
that perhaps 75 percent of
Arizonians support a
withdrawal of U.S. troops
not only from Iraq and
Afghanistan, but from South
Korea and Germany as well.
McCain even admitted that
the old GOP
noninterventionist wing
which consisted of "Henry
Ford, Charles Lindberg [Jr.]
and these people "--that is,
the anti-war "Taft wing"
versus the prop-war
"Eisenhower wing"-- is an
old conflict that still
simmers many decades after
the late Sen. Robert Taft
and other like-minded people
tried to keep the GOP from
becoming the "me too" war
party it has largely become
today.
Although 263,000 Maricopa
County, Az. homes are empty,
McCain still agreed with
WACA that "it's up to us to
try"--in terms of himself
and WACA prodding American
citizens and political
candidates to take foreign
policy concerns much more
seriously.
The irony is that
internationalist free trade
policies that WACA supports
are the cause of much of the
economic decline. WACA, its
brethren in the Council on
Foreign Relations and many
other internationalists
think tanks are loath to
favor import tariffs, fair
and balanced trade and other
nationalist measures that
might lift the nation's
citizens enough economically
to actually make WACA's
internationalist worldview
more appealing to everyday
people. Thus, WACA's
anti-protectionists,
interventionists stance,
which tends to foster
economic decline, is the
very thing stopping this
globalist awakening.
Brzezinski, the Trilateral
Commission co-founder and
former national security
advisor to President Carter,
essentially said that while
China is certainly a rival
of the U.S., the U.S.
military budget is still
larger than that of all
other nations combined, and
China's naval buildup, while
it bears watching, should
not be seen as an overt
threat against America. yet
he worried about a rise in
Chinese nationalism, calling
it "a very emotionalizing
force that can transform
into something much more
ominous."
he added that unless the European Union makes its "political union catch up with its economic union," the current disjunction at the EU will continue and the union could unravel. He called the EU "a non-existing political union ... theoretically, it's a loose confederation."New Hampshire board decides Obama eligibility
Attorney planning appeal
based on fraud suspicions
Posted: November 18, 2011
5:55 pm Eastern
By Bob Unruh
© 2011 WND
A state board in New
Hampshire has decided that
Barack Obama's name is good
to go on the state's 2012
presidential ballot because
the application was filled
out properly and the $1,000
fee was paid, according to
an attorney who challenged
his candidacy because of
suspicions of fraud.
The determination came today
from the state's Ballot Law
Commission, which heard
arguments from attorney Orly
Taitz, who had filed a
complaint about Obama's
candidacy that was joined by
several state lawmakers.
A spokesman at the
commission's office today
told WND that the members
had "broken up" their
meeting and left
immediately, leaving no
information about any
decisions they made.
But Taitz told WND in a
telephone interview that she
was unable to get the board
to remove Obama from the
ballot, despite the evidence
she submitted of alleged
fraud regarding his birth
certificate. The evidence,
she charged, indicates he
does not meet the
Constitution's requirement
that the president be a
"natural born citizen."
She also presented
allegations and evidence
concerning Obama's use of a
Social Security number from
Connecticut, even though he
has no links to the state
while growing up. The use of
such a number has been cited
by critics as evidence of
fraudulent activities.
(
Taitz said state officials
concluded that the
application for Obama to be
on the ballot was correctly
submitted and the fee was
paid. That was the end of
their concerns, she said.
The board's action:
"I cross-examined," Taitz
told WND. "I said if I were
to tell a lie and give you
an application saying
fraudulently I was born here
and eligible and give you a
thousand-dollar check, would
you allow me on the
presidential ballot?"
"If there is not a
challenge," she said she was
told.
She said she now will
consider her options to
appeal the board's decision.
"The people [attending the
meeting] there were angry at
how we have such corruption
in government," Taitz told
WND.
Her allegations of fraud are
connected to Obama's Social
Security number, which
several experts and
investigators have said
needs to be explained.
That's the image of a
Hawaiian "Certificate of
Live Birth" that Obama
released in April as
documentation of a Hawaiian
birth. Many experts have
stated on the record that
they believe it is
fraudulent for many reasons.
thers say Obama wouldn't
qualify as a "natural born
citizen" regardless of his
birthplace because the
Founders probably understood
that term to mean a child
born of citizen parents.
Obama's father never was a
citizen of the U.S.
New Hampshire is important,
because the state holds the
first presidential primary
Jan. 10, 2012.
There also is documentation
that the state board
previously has removed
candidates from ballots for
a number of reasons.
Among the local officials
who joined with Taitz in
expressing concern about the
Obama candidacy were Reps.
Harry Accornero of Laconia,
Lucien and Carol Vita of
Middleton and Larry
Rappaport of Colebrook.
"There is sufficient
controversy that I want it
investigated," Rappaport
told the Concord Monitor.
"We've never gotten an
answer."
Taitz noted that the state's
election code contains a
statement that requires a
candidate to swear to his
qualification to be
president pursuant to
Article II, Section 1,
Clause 4 of the United
States Constitution, which
states, "No person except a
natural born citizen, or a
citizen of the United
States, at the time of the
adoption of this
Constitution, shall be
eligible to the office of
president."
Taitz has been involved in a
number of high-profile cases
over the past few years that
have challenged Obama's
eligibility under the
Constitution
The complaint alleged that
Obama is ineligible because
"he never provided any
documentary evidence of his
natural-born status."
Further, "The most
staggering evidence is Mr.
Obama's lack of a valid
Social Security number and
his use of a fraudulently
obtained Social Security
number from the state of
Connecticut, a state where
he never resided, which was
never assigned to Obama,
according to E-Verify," the
complaint stated.
It alleged not only is the
Obama birth documentation a
modern printout, there are
numerous experts who attest
it is fraudulent.
"Taitz received an affidavit
from scanning machines
expert Douglas Vogt. … It
shows further evidence of
forgery, such as different
types of ink used. Some of
the document shows as gray
scale scanning, some as
black and white scanning,
some color. It shows
different types of letters
and kerning … numerous other
parameters lead to the same
conclusion, that the
document in question is not
a copy of a 1961 type
written document, but a
computer generated forgery,
created by cutting and
pasting bits and pieces from
different documents and
filling in the blanks with
computer graphics," the
document explained.
"Obama does not have an
valid identification papers,
which are necessary to be a
candidate on the ballot,
running for the U.S.
presidency, based upon New
Hampshire elections law
655-17 and on Article 1,
section 2 of the U.S.
Constitution," Taitz wrote.
"This case shows an
unprecedented level of
corruption and lawlessness
in the federal government
and in the government of
Hawaii, which allowed Obama
to get on the ballot in
2008. … Petitioner demands
removal of Obama from the
ballot in the state of New
Hampshire in the Democrat
party primary and demands
immediate criminal
prosecution of Obama and his
accomplices for elections
fraud, common law fraud and
uttering of forged
documents."
Meanwhile, Sheriff Joe
Arpaio of Maricopa County in
Arizona has assigned a
special cold case team to
investigate the possibility
that Obama could use
fraudulent documents to
apply to be on the Arizona
ballot next year.
He's said the investigators
have accumulated thousands
of pages of evidence and his
report likely will come
early in 2012.
Read more: New Hampshire board decides Obama eligibility http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=
THREE VERY GOOD ARICLES
POSTED TODAY
Thursday, November,
17,2011
The American Free Press, 645
Pennsylvania Avenue SE,
Suite 100, Washington, D.C.
20003
1-202-544-5977.
www.americanfreepress.net
WALL STREET 'MOB' BANKROLLS
POWERFUL REP. ERIC CANTOR
By Michael Collins Piper
House Majority Leader Eric
Cano (R-VA.) captured media
attention with his vocal
declaration that
participation in the Occupy
Wall Street movement were
nothing more than "mobs."
His word choice was
interesting since the public
record indicates that Cantor
does indeed know much about
mobs--the Wall
Street mob, in particular.
If there's any one single
member of Congress who can
be reckoned a voice for Wall
Street, it is Cantor.
Even the most cursory review
of Cantor's campaign
financing
demonstrates that a literal
handful of billionaires in
the global financial
plutocracy--all intimately
tied to the London-based
Rothschild family--have been
key forces underwriting
Cantor's career, a point
(especially in light of his
immense power) that cannot
be taken lightly.
The truth is that Cantor is
one of the very few in
Congress--535 members
strong--who has some of the
richest and most powerful
people in the world
bankrolling his political
endeavors.
It is for good reason that
wags say cantor is now "the
cantor of the House"--a play
on words. A cantor is the
person in a synagogue who
leads chants and prayers
along with the rabbi, a
major religious roles.
The fast-rising young
congressman is unique among
House members: While most
rely on campaign
contributions mainly from
their own congressional
district, Cantor has an
unusual expansive array of
contributions pouring in
from across the
country.
During the last election
cycle, Cantor's election
filings as how he received
146 contributions from new
York donors. Contrast that
to only 36 donations from
New York that went to Rep.
John Boehner (Ohio),
ostensibly Cantor's senior
partner in the republican
takeover of the House.
Although Boehner had been a
top-ranking GOP figure for
years and was senior to
Cantor in terms of
congressional longevity no
even Boehner could rival
Cantor in the number of
out-of-state contributions
received.
A brief sampling of Cantor's
New York state contributions
demonstrates the real clout
of these big Wall Street
names--with wide-ranging
ties to the international
plutocratic elite--who are
bankrolling this influential
congressional power broker.
Kenneth Bilalkin, a longtime
crime syndicate legal
mouthpiece, former chairman
of the Anti-Defnation League
of B'nai B'rith, former
chairman of the Conference
of Presidents of Major
American Jewish
Organizations and now
chairman of the
American-Israel Friendship
League. He is also a member
of the Council on Foreign
Relations CFR), the American
offshoot of the London-based
Royal Institute of
International Affairs, the
foreign policy of the
Rothschild banking empire
and its Wall Street
satellites.
Gary Cohn, president and
chief operating officer of
Goldman Sachs, the infamous
Wall Street investment bank
whose financial schemes are
well known to many
American's who've seen their
pensions plundered.
Steven Drucker of
Charmer-Sunbelt, a massive
liquor conglomerate that has
grabbed control of various
facets of the U.S. spirits
industry.
Lewis M. Eisenberg who, as a
former Goldman Sachs partner
, is perhaps best known for
serving as chairman of the
Port Authority of New York
and New Jersey from 1995 to
the pivotal year of 2001.
That was when the authority
turned World Trade Center
(WTC) ownership over to
international wheeler-dealer
Larry Silverstein, who had
the WTC twin towers well
insured and conveniently
made billions from the 9-11
attacks.
Henry Kravis, a member of
both the CFR and the
Rothschild-controlled
Bilderberg group, who was
one of the famous junk bond
kings of the 1980's through
his Kohlberg-Kravis-Roberts
partnership.
Ronald Perelman, as
billionaire head of the
Revlon cosmetics empire, he
also heads a far-reaching
network of radio and
television stations. At one
point he was said to have
been the richest man in
America.
James Tisch, who bought
control of CBS in the
1980's, is another
CFR member and a
scion of the billionaire
Tisch family.
These are just a few of the
powerful New Yorkers who've
been channeling funds to
Cantor's political;
enterprises. Three of
Cantor's other notable
national contributors are:
Jeffrey Epstein of
California, chief financial
officer and executive vice
president of the Oracle
Corporation, the fiefdom of
Larry Ellison, who rose to
fame in the 1970's working
on a database for the
CIA(named 'Oracle"). After
9-11, Ellison offered to
donate software to the U.S.
government to help establish
an identification database
from which national
ID cards for American
citizens would be issued.
Neil Livingstone of
Washington, D.C., a shadowy
figure from the world of
intelligence, known for
longtime close ties to
Israel's Mossad.
Sheldon Adelson, a Las
Vegas-based casino tycoon
and self-described richest
Jew in the world, who in
many respects, is the
modern-day incarnation of
the late Meyer Lansky,
longtime chief of the Jewish
crime syndicate which
cemented its influence with
the rise of legalized casino
gambling in Las Vegas.
It is likewise no
coincidence that the
American-based political
action committee of the
Union Bank of
Switzerland--perhaps the
biggest names in Swiss
banking--has also been a
munificent contributor to
Cantor's political war
chest.
Cantor's particular
influence stems from his
control-along with another
pro-Israeli hardliner,
former Sen. Norm Coleman
(R-Minn.)--of a secret and
well-funded political action
committee, the American
Action network (AAN), ran by
Cantor's close advisor and
former chief of staff, Rob
Collins.
Cantor's AAN operation
generated up to $25 million
in 2010 and spent at least
$16 million on behalf of
Cantor and Wall
Street-approved GOP
candidates
Through AAN, Cantor played a
central role in
orchestrating the GOP
takeover of the House of
Representatives in 2010,
bankrolled by well-heeled
contributors whose names are
not required to be revealed
to the Federal Election
Commission.
It is no coincidence that
two other similar
fundraising ventures,
American Crossroads
and Crossroads GPS--both run
by former George W. Bush
operative Karl Rove--share
offices with Cantor's AAN.
In short, the Washington
political arena--as perhaps
it has never been before--is
now a fiefdom of a certain
brand of mob, and the rise
to power of its most
energetic voices, Cantor,
makes it ever more so.
Sheriffs Rise Up Against
Feds
SEE
TIOP COPS JAILED BELOW
November 11, 2011
admin
By Pat Shannan -
As more people became
dissatisfied with federal
government controls and land
grabs, it was inevitable
that local law enforcement
would eventually see the
bigger picture. At the
northern California
fairgrounds of Yreka last
month, seven California
sheriffs and another from
Oregon gathered with a large
group of citizens to say
that they are finally going
to do something about it.
“A giant has been awakened,”
said Plumas County, Calif.
Sheriff Greg Hagwood, “and
they didn’t count on that,”
speaking of the federal
bureaucracy.
With exposure of the
Emergency Management Center
in San Luis Obispo a few
decades ago, California
began to offer the rest of
the nation some evidence of
the psychological
conditioning aimed from the
federal level at state,
county and city law
enforcement.
Dean Wilson, sheriff of Del
Norte County (Sacramento),
is a great example of this
great awakening. He received
the loudest and longest
applause for
his candor in confessing
past faults after
apologizing for not
understanding the central
government assault and land
grab being committed against
the people and what he
should have been doing about
it. Only in the past year
has he done a turnaround and
begun to behave as a county
sheriff instead of an
extension of federal law
enforcement.
“I had spent a good part of
my life enforcing the penal
code, but not understanding
my oath of office,” he told
the audience. “I was
ignorant and naïve, but now
I know of the assault
against our people by the
federal government.”
Host sheriff John Lopey of
Siskiyou County, speaking
about the federal
environmental intervention,
said: “I have told federal
and state officials over and
over that, yes, we want to
preserve the environment,
but you care more about the
fish, frogs, trees and birds
than you do about the
human race. When will
you start to balance your
decisions to the needs of
the people?” Later he told
the audience, “We are right
now in a fight for our
survival.”
Glenn Palmer, sheriff of
Grant County, Oregon, said,
“If an elected official has
not taken an oath of office,
he does not belong in
office.”
AFP readers are familiar
with the work of former
Arizona Sheriff Richard
Mack, who has spent the
latter half of his life
teaching sheriffs that they
are the top law enforcement
officers in their counties
despite continuing federal
intervention attempts. The
ears that were deaf for so
long may finally be starting
to hear.
“It’s becoming a national
movement now,” Mack told
AFP, citing Immigration and
Naturalization Service
failure at the Mexican
borders, the phony drug war,
plus IRS and other
unconstitutional
intervention within these
states.
His plans to take this
movement national will be
launched at a January
meeting, where he
anticipates 200 sheriffs
will be in attendance.
“The county sheriff is the
last line of defense
guarding our people’s
liberty,” he said.
Retired USAF Col. Richard
Niemela of Reston, Va. has
been exposing the federal
monster for years.
He told AFP: “It’s the
surreptitious domination by
international globalists
insidiously using
unauthorized and illegal
tactics to render null and
void those historic and
unique powers of the
sheriff.”
Posted in: National News
Top Cop Jails Good Guys
November 04, 2011
admin
By Mark Anderson -
American Border Patrol
agents face a surprising
enemy intent on punishing
those who combat the heavily
armed drug traffickers and
immigrant smugglers
operating on the border with
Mexico: U.S. Attorney
General Eric Holder’s
Justice Department.
Take the case of Border
Patrol agent Jesus “Chito”
Diaz, recently sentenced to
two years in prison for
allegedly “lifting the
handcuffs” worn by an
illegal alien he arrested
for smuggling drugs. No
shots were fired.
On Oct. 16, 2008, according
to the account at
FreeAgentDiaz.com, several
agents had rounded up
illegal aliens after
midnight in Eagle Pass,
Texas. The smuggler
handcuffed by Diaz had
become uncooperative and
would not answer questions.
So, using a common control
tactic, Diaz lifted the
cuffs to force the smuggler
to the ground, which didn’t
cause injury.
Diaz, who has a wife and
several children, joins the
ranks of other federal
agents who have been
imprisoned in recent years,
including Ignacio Ramos and
Jose Compean, each of whom
served time for pursuing a
known drug smuggler near El
Paso, Texas.
Two oversight agencies
deemed Diaz innocent.
However, the Mexican
government filed a complaint
against Diaz, and the
Justice Department complied.
While awaiting sentencing,
Diaz wasn’t even granted
bail.
On duty last December in
south Arizona, Border Patrol
agent Brian Terry was
fatally shot by a suspected
drug mobster whose weapon
evidently came from the
federal government’s Fast
and Furious operation. This
undercover scheme involved
the transfer of high-powered
firearms, clandestinely
purchased in the U.S., to
drug cartels. It was
supposedly designed to track
the cartels. But it only
succeeded in arming them.
It was just announced that
Attorney General Holder is
expected to testify before
Congress on Fast and Furious
in December, amid evidence
he knew about it all along,
but he’ll get softer
treatment than
order Patrol agents trying
to actually fight the
transnational crime the
federal government is either
not stopping, or is
enhancing through such
gunrunning.
Amazingly, five other Border
Patrol agents and two local
police officers also are
under federal prosecution
for trying to protect the
border, including the Border
Patrol’s Gary Brugman and
David Sipe.
In Diaz’s case, Johnny
Sutton, the infamous U.S.
attorney involved in the
Ramos-Compean trial,
initially directed the
prosecution before his
Obama-appointed chief deputy
took over. Sutton’s office
charged Diaz with excessive
force and with lying to the
Border Patrol Office of
Internal Affairs. Although
witnesses changed their
stories, and some even
admitted lying to the grand
jury, Diaz was found guilty.
Yet the drug-smuggling
illegal alien named in the
lawsuit was given a visa so
he could travel back and
forth across the border.
“Chito” Diaz has been in
solitary confinement. Weekly
visits from his wife, a
Border Patrol agent herself,
have been limited to 20
minutes. Meanwhile, Mexican
cartels and illegal aliens
continue crossing the
border; thus, real terrorism
is at our doorstep, with
minimal resistance, thanks
to Eric Holder.——
Mark Anderson is a longtime
newsman now working as the
roving editor for AFP. He
and his wife Angie provide
photographs and video of the
events they cover for AFP.
Listen to Mark’s radio show
at
republicbroadcasting.org,
weekdays at 8 p.m. central.
Email him at at
truthhound2@yahoo.com.
Posted in: National News
A thought for the day November 12, 2011
See the
article by a
retired
sheriff
following
this one
The American
Free Press,
645
Pennsylvania
Avenue SE,
Suite 100,
Washington,
D.C. 20003
1-202-544-5977.
www.americanfreepress.net
HERE IS
SOMETHING
FOR YOU TO
THINK ABOUT
Qadaffi Was
a
Nationalists
Hero. No a
Villain.By
Peter
Papaherakles
(Editor's
note: we are
always
suspicious
when the
media gets
on to anyone
about
anything. we
have always
felt that
Qadaffi was
not the man
he was made
out to be by
the
Controlled
media. We
say this,
because we
know that
the media
cannot be
trusted to
tell us the
truth about
anything,
especially
someone like
Qadaffi,
that the
Zionist
hate. they
hated
Qadaffi
because he
was sitting
on all that
oil, while
Israel had
none. Now we
see that he
did not use
the Zionist
banks,
therefore
they made no
profit from
Libya
borrowing
their money
at interest.
Now to our
article.)
On Oct. 20,
one of the
last
remaining
populists
world
leaders,
Muammar
Qadaffi,
allegedly
was cut down
by
globalists
thugs. (We
don't
believe that
they killed
Qadaffi as
reported in
the press -
ED).The
murderers
pated
themselves
on the back
for their
achievement.
What crimes
did Qadaffi
(and Saddam
Hussein
before him)
commit
except
having been
in charge of
countries
with an
abundance of
quality oil?
Was it that
they refused
to succumb
to the usury
racket, or
that they
were
outspoken
about
Israel's
bullying of
the
Palestinians?
Hussein was
accused of
having
weapons of
mass
destruction
(WMDs), but
the WMDs
were
non-existent.
Qadaffi's
alleged
crimes were
ambiguous.
Some cite
the bombing
of a German
discotheque
and the
bombing of
Flight 103.
Subsequent
investigations
showed the
allegations
were
unfounded.
In the disco
case, the
trial
revealed
that at
least two of
the five
suspects
were CIA and
Mossad
(Israeli
Secret
Service)
agents, and
the other
three were
protected by
U.S.
intelligence
agencies. In
the
Lockerbie
bombing, a
witness
publicly
recanted his
testimony,
admitting
that he was
paid $4
million to
lie at the
trial.
Qadaffi's
home was
bombed by
the U.S. Air
Force in
1986,
killing 30
civilians,
including
his
daughter. In
more recent
NATO
attempts on
his life,
one of his
sons and
three
granddaughters
were killed.
Most
Americans
are not
aware how
good the
Libyans had
it under
Qadaffi.
In his 42
years of
serving
Libya as
"the brother
leader of
the
revolution,"
he took it
from being
the poorest
country in
the world to
having the
highest
standard of
living in
all of
Africa--and
ahead of
Russia,
Brazil and
Saudi
Arabia.
Education
was free;
the
government
would even
pay for
students
abroad.
Health care
was free for
all Libyans.
Electricity
was also
free for
everyone;
the price of
gasoline was
14 cents a
gallon. A
loaf of
bread cost
less than a
half a cent.
If someone
bought a new
car, the
state would
pay half the
cost.
Newlyweds
received
$50,000
toward the
purchase of
a home, and
those
wishing to
engage in
farming got
free land, a
free home,
free
equipment,
livestock
and seeds. A
portion of
Libyan oil
sales was
credited
directly to
the bank
accounts of
all
citizens. If
a university
graduate was
unable to
find
employment
after
graduation,
the state
would pay
the average
salary of
the
profession
until
employment
was found.
Even more
amazing were
Libya's
banking
policies,
which might
explain why
it was
targeted:
All bank
loans were
interest
free. The
central bank
was state
owned and
was not
controlled
by the
Rothschild's.
Money was
interest
free and as
a result,
Libya had
zero
national
debt, not a
penny owed
to anyone.
Not
only did
Libya have
no national
debt, but it
had a $150
billion
surplus.
Literacy
rates went
from 20 to
83 percent.
Another
reason Libya
was attacked
was that
Qadaffi
broke rule
No. 1in the
global power
establishment:
He was
working to
change
payment for
oil away
from the
U.S. dollar.
That is the
one thing
the U.S. can
never allow,
because the
dollar is
the
international
reserve
currency for
the purchase
of oil.
No, Qadaffi
was not the
dictator as
we have been
led to
believe, nor
was he a
terrorists.
The only
terror he
spread was
in the
banking
headquarters
of the
global
establishment.
*
(So then, it
all really
comes down
to MONEY and
the
Controllers
want to have
control over
all money
-ED).
EIGHT LONELY SOULS By: Jim R. Schwiesow
Thursday, November 3, 2011
VOTE SCAM
For lack of a better title, we are going to call this “Vote Scam”, because as you surely know, today’s elections are allowed just to keep people thinking that they really have a say in what their government does. We believe, based on ail that we know from years of experience, that the outcome of the next election has already been decided and no matter what we do, we cannot change that outcome. the Controllers already know who the next president will be, and who will be in congress.
Sure we will vote out a few congressmen and women, but there will still be a majority left to do the will of the Controllers. You remember, that in the last election, we voted in 100 new congressmen and most of them voted to renew the so-called Patriot Act, with all its bad features. Nothing really changed, the new Congress gave the government the authority to increase the national debt, the border is still open, and the illegal aliens are still here and taking advantage of all the so-called social programs to help the poor. We highly recommend this book by the Collier brothers, because they were the ones that brought this to the attention of many thousand patriots across the country. This book will open your eyes to how the Controllers are able to steal the elections
We also recommend the book THE NEW WORLD ORDER EXPOSED, by Victor Thorn. This 600 page book goes into detail about everything that you need to know to make sound decisions. You think you are well informed, then we challenge you get this book to see just how little you do know. Both book are available from amazon.com.
We will discuss the media and show you that the MEDIA IS THE ENEMY, the worst enemy we have and we will show you, who owns and controls the media.
The American free Press is an independent newspaper out of Washington D.C. that, week-after-week, brings you news that no one else will tackle. We know some of these investigators and have talked with others and we know they can be trusted to bring
you very important news. they are usually weeks, or even months ahead of the rest of the county in reporting vital news that you need to make sound decision. You can subscribe to the Free Press by calling 202-544-5977-website www.americanfreepress.
net
IF you read these two books and subscribe to the free press you will be one of the best informed people in the country. They are not politically correct, so you can expect some eye opening articles that will keep you informed of the important events taking place all over the country and the world.
In this section we are going to tell you who they are and show you the faces of our worst enemy. The people you see here are the heads of the major Controlled media. They are the ones that decide what news you are to get and what you are not allowed to hear. This way they control what goes on in the country. Congressmen fear, because the media can destroy the political career of any would be politician. A politicians that crosses the Controlled media can kiss his political career good bye. In our 60 years in the trenches, we have seen just about every dirty trick in the book pulled on politicians that
dared to buck the system. We know that no one is too big to fall. We have seen residents, governors, senators, congressmen, mayors and others that did not “play ball.” All politicians know this and that is why there are subjects that are off limits and you cannot get anyone that wants to stay in office to discuss these subjects. You could
not get Ron Paul to even mention the fact that Obama is not qualified to be president. Paul wants to audit the Fed, but he knows there is not enough support in Congress to ever do that. The list of taboo subjects is known by all politicians. We will have more on that subject a little later.
Let us ask you a simple question: You know that we know less about Barack Hussein Obama than we do about anyone to ever sit in the white House. But, has the media discusses any of these thing? NO! they have not and they will not, unless they decide to
dump him in the next election for another Judas goat. If the media was pro-American, do you think Obama would have ever been elected president? For that matter, I can’t think of any president in the last 100 years that would have been elected, if the media
was on their toes and told what they knew about them. Let someone like John F. Kennedy come along and try and do a decent job for his country and you see what happens to them. Look at Richard Nixon, after he was re-elected, he set out to change his Middle East policy to an even-handed police towards all nations in the region and he
was driven from office. Jimmy Carter was planning on changing his policies after he was reelected, but someone in his inner-circle got wind of what he planned and Carter became a one term president. the media can destroy the career of any politician that doesn’t toe the line and do as he is expected to do.
If the media was honest and reported the truth, they would not have kept the truth from the people about what happened to the federal building in Oklahoma City. We were in Oklahoma City on another when the federal building was bombed. We sat there in our hotel room and watched the TV as the incident was reported. The anchor men said that vital rescue work was stopped, because two more unexploded bombs were found. It showed a lady running from the building and she said, “Oh my God, not another bomb.” Randal terry an explosive expert said they were lucky to have these two unexploded bombs, because they could take them apart and tell where they were made. But that was the last we ever heard of Randal Terry, we suppose he never got a chance to see the two bombs.
After reporting these two bombs and the other news all day long, the following happened. After a commercial, the anchors came back and with a straight face, they said it had now been confirmed by BAFT, that the explosion was caused by a CAR BOMB. No more mention of the two unexploded bombs, it was now official that a car
bomb had done the damage and we had BAFT’s WORD ON IT! Someone got to thinking and decided that a CAR BOMB could not do that much damage, so they increased the bomb carrying vehicle to a pick-up truck. But, this was still too small, so here comes the Rider truck. Even the dumbest moron should get suspicious of this scenario. But there was no mention of this discrepancy by the Controlled media. This confirms that old saying, “You can fool some of the people ALL the time and ALL the people some of the time.” Well as soon as my partner and I heard that we jumped in our rented car and headed for the federal building, because we smelled a rat. When we arrived at the scene, there was no damaged car and there was debri scatters all the way across the street and damaged one of the buildings.
This was strange, because the derbi should have been blown INSIDE the building and not OUTSIDE. Now we knew there was a very serious problem with the story we had just heard on the TV.
We later learned, that there were no children belonging to the BAFT and FBI agents in the nursery that day. Several other children perished, but no BAFT or FBI children were among them. So who knew what and when did they know it? We, as investigative journalists, saw the problem right away, but the Controlled media never did see the
problem. To this day, they have never told the people the truth about the bombing of the federal building. You can see why we say, the Controller hide the truth from the American people. We remember what we used to say about the media in the old Soviet Union. We said the government owned the media. Today we say, here in the USA,
that the media owns the government and there is no difference between the two systems.
It is plain to see, that the media and the government is lying to the American propel every day. Watching network news is like watching a movie. The script has been prepared and the actors read their lines just as they are written. It is kind of like being in Fantasy Land. The nightly news is not the real thing and people need to know this
and watch out for these phony reporters. Here is where you need the American Free Press, because you can depend on this paper to tell you the truth.
On another page we tell you about the Controlled media and the fact, that ALL major media outlets are controlled by 20 Zionist Jewish families. Get that 20 families control ALL major media outlets and you wonder why you never get the truth from the media.
It is easy to see the problem: Patriots are all swimming in different directions, concerned with many different things. the Muslim terrorists, the democrats, Obama Care, illegal aliens, the bankers, etc., etc., etc., while the controllers are ALL swimming in one direction concerned with destroying the world as we know it and remaking it in their own image. Instead of a thousand different objects, they are concerned with only ONE and that is why they are winning.
You see, they are pitting us one against the other: Liberals vs. conservatives, Democrats against Republicans, war hawks against doves, whites against blacks, blacks against Mexicans and it goes on and on that way. We need to quit fighting against each other and educate ourselves to the real enemy and concentrate on defeating the enemy instead of letting the enemy lead us around like zombies.
Every now and then, the Controllers let the cat out of the bag and brag about what they are getting away with. We know this because we have read some of their statements. We have read the PROTOCOLS OF THE LEARNED ELDERS OF ZION, where they brag about what they have already done and what they expect to do and
how they have captured the media and most of the gold into their hands.
Here is some of them from The New World Order Exposed:
Richard Salent (former president pf CBS News): “Our job is to give
people not what they want, but what we decide they ought to have.”
Lyndon Johnson, (35th president: “Reporters are puppets. They
simply respond to the pull of the most powerful strings.”
Bill Moyers (television journalists): “Most of the news on television is,
ultimately, whatever the government says is news.”
Johnny Carson: “How much of the national news that you report to
he public each night consists of information you’ve actually gone
out and dug upon own?”
Connie Chung (responding to Johnny’s question): “In all honesty, we Connie Chung
are often at the mercy of the White House for the news we report.
Frequently, we simply report verbatim what the White House tells
us.”
The CIA and the Cult of Intelligence (Marchetti & Marks): “Only about
20% of the CIA’s career employees work on intelligence analysis and
information processing. About 2/3 of all CIA funds and manpower are
spent on “covert operations, “such as the manipulation of public opin-
ion and elections and its mass media manipulation activity.”
There should be a sign over the door of all political organizations: Congress, the White House, the FBI, the CIA, Homeland Security, all political parties, think tanks, and foundations: that says, “NO HONEST PEOPLE NEED APPLY. We can say this because an honest person scares the hell out of politicians and those who protect
them.
It can be a very dangerous thing to get to involved investigating what the Controllers don’t want investigated. In other words don’t get too close to the truth or it could be dangerous.
Dorothy Kilgallen was such a reported. Some of you old timers will remember how sharp she was on the TV show, “What’s my line.” She must have gotten a little too close in her investigation of the Kennedy assassination, because she was murdered at the tender age of 52, in 1965. The official cause of death “undetermined”, that was a new one on us. Her family was well aware of the circumstances, but no one would comment on any theories around at that time. This could happen to anyone that does not play the game according to the rules laid down by the Controllers.
Arthur Koestler, a Jewish historian wrote a book, “The Thirteenth Tribe,” Whereby, he told who the Zionist are and where they came from and the fact, that they are not Jews at all. That was the reason for the name of the book, for you know that there were only twelve tribes of Israel.
Shortly after the book was published, he and his wife, “committed suicide” in their home. Suicide, heart attacks and plane crashes is a favorite way to get rid of trouble makers or potential trouble makers.
John F. Kennedy Jr. was gaining in popularity in his own right. We thought, at the time, that he was grooming himself to be president. We don’t know where he planned to start his political career, but it is obvious, that the Controllers feared him and what he might be able to do if he was ever elected to any office. His death: A “plane crash,” taking with him his new wife and her sister. Something you must realize: these people are evil people and life means nothing to them and it don’t matter who you are, even the president of the United States, if he get in the way will have to die.
With the corrupt media, some sex scandal, some awful crime or so-called natural disaster is worth reporting, while anything that is really important to our freedom will never see the light of day. The media’s job and the jobs of the weasels that work for them, is to keep you in the dark about what is happening and they are doing a
masterful job and the public could care less, because they do not have a clue about the danger they are in. No matter how bad things get, the media is not going to tell you, if it will affect their plan for global conquest.
The following is taken from The New World Order Exposed: “In mid April, 2002, the Trilateral Commission met for four days at the Ritz Carlton Hotel in Washington, D.C. As is their custom, this highly influential group of world leaders from north America, Japan
and Europe plotted ways to promote heir Globalists agenda. Some of the items on their nefarious list this year were:
* America’s upcoming invasion of Iraq, and how to lure Europe and
other Asian nations into supporting our War Machine.
* The need to further create a multinational financial octopus, with the
U.N. as the head of a one-world government.
* A decision to keep pumping money, technology, and computers into
China. bolstering them as the next premier global superpower.
* A decision to funnel more American aid to “under-exploited” foreign
countries, leading the way for the implementation of a World Tax.
* Prevention of the Israeli/Palestinian war from turning into a complete powder
keg, thus endangering our Middle Eastern oil supplies.
How do you feel about these goals of the Controllers, do they fit in with what you would like to see happen? Of course not, but then what you want is never considered important by the Controllers or the people that they elect to office. YOU are not important in the scheme of things. Here are some of the Controllers present. You will see that these are names that you seldom ever hear about, because they do not want to be known to the people they are planning to destroy:
David Rockefeller: Overlord, Chase Manhattan Bank
Paul Volcker: Former Chairman, Federal Reserve
Charles Robb: Former republican Senator from Virginia
Robert McNamara: Former Sec. of Defense
Kenneth Lay: Former CEO, Enron
Henry Kissinger: Former Sec. of State, a name that is always popping up
Winston Lord: Former Ambassador to China
David Gergen: Editor, U.S. News and World Report
Zbginiew Brezezinski: Former Head of National Security, Trilateral Omission co-founder
Madeline Albright: Former Sec. of State
John Deutch: Former Director, CIA
Richard Holbrook: Former U.S. Ambassador to UN.
Harold Brown: Former Sec. Defense
Strobe Talbott: Former Under Sec. of State
tom Foley: former Speaker of the House, defeated for re-election
SPEAKERS
Dick Cheney: Vice President U.S.
Alan Greenspan: C
Former Chairman, Federal Reserve
Colin Powell: Former Sec. of State
Donald Rumsfeld: Former Sec. of Defense
Now get a load of this bunch in attendance:
Fuji Xerox - Germany: the U.S. Ambassador - Georgetown: professor - Washington Post: columnist - Archer-Daniels Midland: chairman - Club of Rome: percipient - International Monetary Fund: managing director - Canada - UK: former High Commissioner - British Parliament: member - AFL-CIO NITE branch: president emeritus - Federal Reserve: president - Levi-Strauss: chairman - Rothschild & Sons: director - Citicorp: vice chairman - Institution of Global Economics: Seoul CEO - Mexican government: Former President, and Minister of Trade - Irish continence of government: former senator - Xerox \: former CEO
There was a total of 251 Controllers, meeting in Washington D.C., but we never saw a single word about this in our local paper. the Controlled media was represented there, but there was not a peep out of them.
STOLEN VOTES
This is from the New World Order Exposed and the Collier brothers:
“Before delving into my overview of “Votescam,” I’d like to provide a few examples of how pervasive and appalling the electoral process is in this country. Following these case histories, we’ll take a very hard look at not only the problems confronting us, but also a way to correct this situation.
Example one: “In the 1970 Dade County, Florida election, Jim and Ken Collier, authors of Votescam, found that three minutes after the polls had closed, all of the major networks had already projected the winners in over 259 races! Only one minute after the polls had closed, Channel 7 projected that a certain candidate would not only win, but would receive 96, 499 total votes. Well, when the official results were returned, guess how many votes this candidate received? - -96,499. Channel 7 was 100% accurate only one minute after the voting had ended!
“The Collier brothers went one step further and tracked down all the projections versus the actual results for all the major Florida races in 1970. here is what they found:
Governor: Projected 141,387 actual count 141,866.
Senate 43: “ 45, 696 “ “ 45,881
House 98: “ 97,031 “ “ 96,499
House 10: “ 67,940 “ “ 68,491
House 107: “ 81,802 “ “ 81,539
“The question we have to ask is: How can the networks not only be so accurate, but arrive at these startling projections one to three minutes after the polls close? Think about it. After the voting stations close at 9:00 PM, what needs to be done? Tens of thousands of punch card ballots need to be collected: then they must be fed into a punch card reader. Now, I know what this process entails because I operated an entire room full of IBM Mainframe computers during the mid-1980’s (back when the punch cards were still in use).
“To read even a few drawers of cards was quite an ordeal, considering all the misdeeds, jams, etc. Anyway, after all the cards are read, he data needs to be compiled, organized, printed out, then transmitted to the television station where it’ll be prepared for broadcast. Do you think all of these steps can be taken i one-to-three minutes?
“The Collier Brothers found it very implausible, so they went to Channel 7 and tried to track down the “super computer” that made these projections only one-to-three minutes after the polls closed, all with 99-100% accuracy. The first thing they wanted to know was which reporter called in the raw totals to the television studio. They were told that it wasn’t a reporter, after all, but a member of the League of Women Voters.
“Since only a handful of reporters could be out in the field (considering that this was only an affiliate station), it would seem logical that only a few precincts could be sampled. But how, they wondered, could 99% of the precincts be reporting by 11:00 - only two hours after the polls closed? The League of Women Voters must be incredibly efficient.
So the Colliers visited Joyce Deiffenderfer, head of the local League of Women Voters, and asked for a list of the people who had counted votes on election night (since Channel 7 said that’s how they got their results). Realizing the cat was out of the bag, Ms. Deiffenderfer, in tears, admitted that here weren’t any LWV members in any of the precincts that night. They hadn’t counted a single vote, and she didn’t ‘want to get caught up in this thing.’” Besides that no one was able to find this super computer that counted all the votes.
Example TWO: “In a 1973 Florida election, Printomatic Voting Machines had been installed to make the entire process run smoother. All of the Printomatic devices have a locked in back that every election supervisor is supposed to check before the election to insure that all he wheels were set at zero. But all of the keys had been taken away from the supervisor, so none of the totals could be verified. Shortly after he polls opened, the
paper rolls began to jam in all the machines, making them impossible.
“Since no one could vote, the backs of each device were eventually opened, and when the paper rollers were pulled out, they all had the final vote totals already printed on them at seven o’clock in the morning! Needless o say, every election volunteer walked off the job.
“Example THREE If you think voter fraud only happened during AL Capone’s days (do you recall heir helpful hint - “vote early, and often”), you’re seriously mistaken. Here are a few other “tricks of the trade”:
* Shave the wheels in the back of a voting machine so they skip ahead.
*Before the polls open, unlock the back of the voting device and set the total counter ahead for a certain candidate.
* If a clear ballot box isn’t used, stuff it with pre-punched vote cards before the polls open.
*If a computerized machine is used, unplug it or turn it off so all the previous totals are erased.
*Finally, he league of Women Voters has been captured on video in Florida with pencils and tweezers punching out card for certain candidates; then shoving them into ballot boxes.
“Example Four Finally, during the 1996 Republican Party Primary, Pat Buchanan was beating every other candidate in the early stages of the race, especially Bob Dole and Steve Forbes. then when he rolled into Arizona with high hopes of another victory that would catapult him toward getting his party’s nomination, something strange happened. The computers broke down!
“Yes, VNS had actually declared Buchanan he winner. Karen Johnson, Buchanan’s Arizona State Coordinator, got a call from Governor Fife Symington congratulating her on what he called a “decisive” victory. Senator John McCain also drafted a congratulatory letter, while all three networks and CNN said that Dole would definitely finish third, while Forbes took second and Buchanan won.
“Then the computers mysteriously went down. When they came back up, guess what happened. Pat Buchanan ended up a distant third, while Dole won! When asked about this phenomenon, Buchanan joked about the computers (referring to the “fix” being in), “They seemed to work better after they brought ‘em back!”
VOTER NEWS SERVICE (VNS)
“As mentioned, VNS is the only American company that counts votes in every Federal election. Ponder this point for a moment. A faceless corporation that 99% of the people in this country have never heard of is responsible for tabulating our votes. This Service was created by the Big Six in 1964 - one year after JFK was assassinated, and is currently run by ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, FOX, and AP. Over the years, VNS has gone through a variety of name changes and was originally called NES (News Elect Services).
“When you consider the ramifications of every Presidential, Congressional, and Gubernatorial race, you’ll see that VNS is one of the most influential corporations in America. Yet, no one ever heard of them. How can such a fantastic responsibility be placed in the hands of a company that was developed by a consortium of corporate media conglomerates? The most glaring observation one could make from this situation is: if a faceless, unknown agency (VNS) is the sole vote counter rather than accountable local volunteers in each precinct, is it conceivable that a wealthy politician or political party could clandestinely pay them off to rig an election?
“The answer is obvious, especially when 99% of the American people don’t even know about the existence of VNS.
‘Robert H. Lande, Professor of Law at the University of Baltimore in a letter )dated October 22, 2000) to the United States Justice Dept. and the Federal Election Trade Commission on behalf of the American Antitrust Institute, said, “the Government should file suit to break up the VNS.” He continued (shortly after the 2000 fall election): “Why the uniformity of wrong results? This can be explained by a lack of competition. All of the “competing” major networks are actually colluding with one another, and they call their collusion the VNS.” Finally, Mr. Lande concludes, “If the six largest manufacturer of automobiles, canned food, or aluminum decided to close existing operations and pool resources to save money, the antitrust enforcement agencies would be after them immediately.”
“On Monday, November 2, 1988, the night BEFORE the off-year elections, ABC News posted hundreds of election results - one whole day before a single person ever placed a vote!
“Now that we know the networks, CNN, FOX, and AP all get heir election results from the same source - VNS - we need to ask ourselves, why is there such an emphasis on speed? Speed is the key, at least where the networks are concerned. Why? Because the illusion of reporting “speedy” results is the second piece of the puzzle needed to steal an election.....Here’s a typical scenario:
“Dan Rather appears on your TV screen at one minute after the hour .. one minute after the polls closed in a certain part of the country. Naturally, he’ll have some “projections,” and he’ll even announce some winners - one minute after the polls close.
“So, they’ll rack up heir totals, show who is ahead; and focus their attention on the last intangible ... those races that are “too closes to call.” Once you hear those words, you know you’re in trouble. That’s when there’s a huge gap in reporting - the lag time - when Dan rather talks to all his “boys” to get their expert opinion. Of course, not once is he mentioning that all their results are coming from VNS. that information isn’t important enough for the American people to know.”
As you all well know, a computer can be programmed to do whatever the programmer tells it to do. The programmer could say 2 + 2 + 5 and that is what the computer will tell you. The answers is all wrong, but the computer don’t know that, because it was programmed to give you the answer that it gave you.
We know of one instance, where the vote counting machine was programmed to switch ever 5th vote to the opposing candidate. The person the people elected “lost” the election with the aid of the programmer, that programmed the computer.
This writer just celebrated his 85th birthday and I have never been polled to see how I feel about any subject and I don’t know anyone who has ever been polled for their opinion or how they will vote on election day. So then, who do these people taking the poll talk to? Are the polls a fantasy dreamed up by the Controllers to help sway public opinion? I would answer that, YES!
In ever election for president, here is always a front-runner. My question has always, “Who nominated this person as the front runner?” Well the answer to that question is simple; the Controlled major media is the culprit. This year, the media would have us believe that Mitt Romney is the front -runner. Who are they trying to kid?
But, does it really matter who we vote for? We firmly believe that the candidate has already been selected and he or she will be elected just as the Controllers have already decided. How we vote means nothing in the long run. The Controller will elect the person that is willing to do as they are told.
It really doesn’t matter who is elected president, they will be surrounded by Bilderbergs, Trilateral Commission and Council on Foreign Relation members. here are some examples:
Nixon: 115 CFR members
Carter: 284 CFR members
Reagan: 257 CFR members and Reagan was the one that was going to get the government off our backs, but did nothing to keep his promises and now you can see why.
Bush: 382 CFR members
Clinton: 17 of his top 19 cabinet members were either CFR or TC members.
So, as they say in the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion: “We take a person totally unqualified to lead, then we surround him with our own advisor and we actually run the government.” You can see by the number of CFR people surrounding the presidents who really runs the government. Besides the CFR members, there are many Trilateral Commission and Bilderberg members also around the presidents. Presidents and members of Congress are mere puppets and their strings are being pulled by the Controllers, who pay for their elections
We well remember the 1964 presidential election, because we supported and worked for Senator Barry Goldwater in Orange County, Calif. My wife was a volunteer working at the voting prescient where we voted. She had to get up early and report and had to stay late to count the votes and post them before sending them to the County office to be tabulated. Two of us followed the car that took the votes to the County office. We were suspicious that something might happen on the way.
Things have changed since that day in most parts of the country. People either vote on a voting machine or their votes are counted by a machine. Here in Arizona we still leave a paper trail, so that votes can be counted, if there is some question as to the accuracy of the votes. But with a voting machine, there is no paper trail and we must take the word of the County employees as to the accuracy. but we know that the Controllers have placed their own people in these office all across the country, so we have no way of knowing if the votes are counted right.
Let us return to victor Thorn and The New World Order Exposed, as he looks at
VOTESCAM and COMPUTERIXED VOTING:
“In an election totally free of fraud, citizens would hand-write their votes on paper ballots, place them in a clear box; hen watch as an impartial group of volunteers counted their votes in full view. The results would be posted at the polling place before being shipped to the county courthouse.
“With computerized voting, we simply send a ‘blip” through cyberspace. There is no paper trail (a physical ballot), nor are there any checks and balances. We’re simply told to trust those in charge of the election and everything will be okay. Considering the evidence I’ve provided thus far ,how much faith does that inspire in you?
“What if we found that it’s possible to manipulate these computerized unseen results to “correspond” to the projections (also doctored) that were given one minute after the polls closed so that everything would be OFFICIAL;? What if someone told you - “Hey, it’d be very easy to find a computer programmer who could write some software that would already determine the winner regardless of the vote totals? The procedure wouldn’t be much more difficult to pull off than placing a paper roller into the back of a Printomatic voting machine that already had the totals pre-printed on them.
“Now I’m sure someone will say this is preposterous! To prove the process isn’t corrupt, all the software designers have to do is show you the “source code” from their program. How complicated could it be to write a program that simply counts votes? Any tenth grade kid who has taken an introductory course in computer science could write it.
“But guess what? Numerous researchers have tried to inspect the computer software at VNS. But instead of gladly allowing them to do so (these are fair and open elections, aren’t they? VNS flatly denied their request, saying their programs were “trade secrets.” In other words, heir software is afforded the same protection as any other corporate trade secret. To me, the same rationale doesn’t apply for two reasons.
“First, a privately owned for-profit company is much different from one that is very influential in determining who will assume the Presidency and a large number of Congressional seats. My second argument is just as straightforward: What do these software designers have to hide?
“They haven’t created programs that prevent America from being bombed by incoming ballistic missiles like those used by NORAD. The only thing (supposedly) their software does is count votes. Why all the secrecy? Why don’t they want anyone inspecting their source codes?
“On the night before the 1988 Presidential election, the following conversation took place on the CBS Evening news:
Dan Rather: Realistically could the fix be put on in a national election?
Howard J. Straus (computer expert - Princeton University): Get me a job with a company that writes the software for this program. then I’d have access to one-third of the votes. is that enough to fix a general election?
Mr. Strauss has also said, “When it comes to computerized elections, here are no safeguards. It is not a door without locks; It’s a house without doors.”
Judge Richard Niehouse, in a 1985 ruling against the Cincinnati Board of Elections: “There is no adequate and proper safeguard against the computers being programmed to distort the election results.”
Eva Waskell, an election researcher for over ten years, weighed in with this observation: “One major problem is that computer codes that run the machines are protected as trade secrets, which makes it very hard to have an election independently audited.” She also added, “The election industry is virtually unregulated. There are no mandatory regulations or standards for accurately recording and counting votes.”
Craig C. Donsanto, deputy Attorney in the Justice Dept., warned us in a July 4, 1989 edition of the Los Angeles Times: “You have to have access and some degree of technical knowledge to penetrate an electronic tabulating system. Most of them have been or will be .... simply because voting is the way we determine who gets power in this country.”
“The following is a quote from the same Los Angeles Times article on vote fraud (7-4-89): “Some critics of computerized vote counting worry about the potential for ‘trapdoors,” ‘time bombs’ and ‘Trojan Horses.’ A computer operator with the correct password could place a trapdoor, or a series of hidden vote counting instructions inside the system, according to Election Watch Report. Once into the system, the operator could program the computer to count vote for one candidate as votes for another. After the votes have been changed to swing the election, the trapdoor could be closed.”
“In a letter, Attorney Ellis Rubin (3-24-92) described to Attorney general William Barr how to rig computerized voting: ‘Anyone with access codes could punch into elections and change the results; and nobody would be the wiser. That also foes for the software involved.’”
As we said at the beginning, we firmly believe that the Controllers have already decided who will be the next President and there is nothing we can do about it. If they want to keep Obama, which we don’t believe they will, they will run some republican hat does not have a chance to win. Someone like Ron Paul that would, possible, be a good president, or Michael Bachmann. Once these people are nominated, the media will go to work on them and convince the people that they should not be elected. the media can say anything they want to say and the candidate will have a very hard time responding to the obligation, because the media will not report what they have to say in their defense.
| ||||||||||||||||||||